[MRCG] Net Time Change Discussion?

amillertkx at aol.com amillertkx at aol.com
Sun Nov 26 20:06:08 EST 2017


I also think a move to 160 would not be a great idea. An earlier start is probably best at this point as we enter the 75 meter winter  doldrums. 4 or 5 might work better for the coverage we need.

Sent from my 1944 Westinghouse TBM 

> On Nov 26, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
> 
> The new net time of 18:00 PST hasn't been working well. Yesterday, I couldn't hear anybody at all. Maybe a different net time would work better? Some folks have suggested temporarily moving to 160m over the winter, but I don't have an antenna system that I can match at 160m yet.
> 
> -- 
> Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
> http://www.nf6x.net/
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCG mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrcg
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCG at mailman.qth.net
> 
> Website: http://www.mrcgwest.org
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the MRCG mailing list