[MRCG] Net Time Change Discussion?
amillertkx at aol.com
amillertkx at aol.com
Tue Dec 5 20:59:29 EST 2017
Its possible but too many start time changes can be detrimental as well. At some point we will have to just power through until more stable conditions return. My vote is to leave it at 6 at this point.
Sent from my 1944 Westinghouse TBM
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 5, 2017, at 5:48 PM, amillertkx--- via MRCG <mrcg at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>>
>> By 5:30 this evening it was a rf wasteland for any stations closer than 1000 miles so I think we are once again up against the forces of nature.
>
> Do you think we might get usable propagation for the AM net if we started sometime between 4:00-5:00?
>
>
> --
> Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
> http://www.nf6x.net/
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCG mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrcg
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCG at mailman.qth.net
>
> Website: http://www.mrcgwest.org
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the MRCG
mailing list