Never operated or worked on a TBX-8, only know what I have seen in the manual and that is that although they use the same plugs in all the series and assume somewhat the same voltages, 12.5 and 500 for the transmitter and 90, -6 and -3 at least for the TBX
to the TBX-6 would suspect the older 6 may not have the same voltages and current draws as a TBX-8
The 8 is a completely different animal in many ways, more modern and different tubes in the receiver and three rubes in the transmitter and the ability to be able to operate in PTT mode with a normal microphone. The TBX pre 8 family all use just one tube in
the transmitter, require manual switching between receive and transmit and just use two different tubes in the receiver with the same type 34 tube as the IF, Detector, Audio and BFO. I think the 34 is also a 2.0 volt tube. Somehow think one or two of the "Non-Eight"
sets may have wanted 135 volts for the audio output stage in the receiver. I think there was an adapter that went on the power cable to correct the difference.
The older sets also required a special high output microphone to suppressor modulate the one tube transmitter. The eight got away from that by using a tube to modulate the PA tube along with a separate oscillator as opposed to the wild feedback path of the
self-excited PA in the earlier radios.
The TBX-8 is like using any of the BC-1306/GRC-9 sets that were around at the same time. The TBX-6 and all its non-eight brethren are a more primitive design using cutting edge technology from the late thirties and although it lacks things like a working AVC
system, requires a big fat carbon microphone and lacks any type of useful frequency display can be a fun radio to operate in the field that works surprisingly well for technology pushing ninety years old.
I am thinking along the lines of building up a box for the receiver that has a 6-volt SLA battery to provide -6 for the bias, regulated -3 for the filament supply and drive an inverter assembly that will provide +135 if I need it and +90 for everything else.
The transmitter may be driven from a 12-volt SLA running the larger 40 watt inverter for the +500 for the plate of the 837 with the 12 volts being used directly for the transmitter filament.
Twenty years ago, when I did this just used the self-excited MO in the transmitter for 3885 but today, I am thinking of using a Progrock assembly to drive the 837. Don't know if it will have enough juice for driving that tube, but the idea of a Pre War design
being excited by device that would have been beyond anyone's vision in 1939 appeals to me.
GRC-9, BC-1306 and SCR-284 sets are around in good numbers today. But who has a pre-war design QRP portable that they can run?
Ray F/KA3EKH
Hi Ray,
Your mote brings up a question about the TBX-8 vs. all of the other models. My copy of the CRF-20337 TBX vibrator power supply manual states that it is for both the TBX-7 and the TBX-8. When I read the setup instructions and look
at the diagram it does not say there is any difference between the -7 and the -8. This is contradicted by an AI query that says the receiver and trnsmitter cables are not compatible. So, which version is correct? I have a nice TBX-6 but no power supply
yet.
Thanks and 73,
Clare N2RJB
All this talk about TBX radios is making me think about running one for the 3885 AM Net at Hamvention. I have the radio and the plug for the receiver and can throw together a power supply without much issue but need the four-pin power plug for the transmitter.
Think it's a PL61 or something like that? Anyone got one? Or at least know the appropriate number for it? Somehow think I have seen that plug used on some other radios too.
Ray F/KA3EKH
_._,_._,_