The Airborne had both a padded jump case and a rigger made harness ( made out of parachute harness material ) to attach the BC-611 to the paratroopers web gear for the jump (along with a padded weapons case, leg bag, musette bag and various other padded bags for rations, ammo, etc - total of over 200lbs.  that each paratrooper jumped with ).  The gloves were for the jump itself, and weren’t anything special. For those in England, many were actually British leather Cavalry gloves. As far as any huge coil or any counterpoise, there is no issued one that I’m aware of. Now that doesn’t mean that some smart, enterprising young trooper didn’t come up with some home brew solution: it just means there was nothing officially blessed by the US Army Signal Corps. I was able to talk to a few WW2 vets from 82nd , 101 and 11th Airborne, and their opinion of the BC-611 was pretty universal - “IT SUCKED!!! “.  They all told me a trooper could yell farther than the BC-611 could transmit. The BC-1000 was a different story. They loved that radio. 

73
Mark D. 
WW2RDO

“In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle, stand like a rock. “.   -   Thomas Jefferson 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2024, at 3:02 PM, Ray Fantini via MRCA <[email protected]> wrote:


Question for smart people, you would think I know this but as my wife will often remind me that I am not the sharpest tool in the shed. I think a half wavelength at 3885 is a hundred twenty feet or so, assume the 611 has a huge coil to make up for this short antenna? Mr. Smith once told me that although you can electrically shorten the active side of a antenna with a coil that dose nothing for your other side of the antenna, the counterpoise and for that to be most effective it’s got to be some sort of fraction of a wavelength. Dam, the counterpoise of the BC-611 is like one foot of case! Maybe there is some component of grounding thru your skin and boots or whatever but what if you’re wearing gloves? This is where the smart part comes in, I am assuming the efficiency of that short antenna and counterpoise results in an overall antenna efficiency of about lest then five percent! Certain some smart person out there can run the program and come back with an exact number.
Think about this in the context of parachuting, even if the antenna was fully extended the ground or counterpoise side of the antenna is like one foot if you were wearing gloves, I don’t think polarization or any of that stuff matters with that small antenna and radio.
My real question is how in the hell did you free fall , deploy the chute and all that other sky diving stuff and hold on to the radio in the first place? That’s an impressive feet.
Trivia! Two radios I have always like from WW2 are the DAV and its evil twin sister the MAB, don’t know if its true but I was told the MAB was designed and deployed as an air assault radio. It used a throat microphone and a weird skull cap that fit under a helmet with the radio strapping to your chest.
 
Ray F/KA3EKH
 

______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html