Slippery slope??? 
Check this out
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11461327/amp/Full-size-replica-WWII-Lancaster-bomber-cockpit-assembled-85-year-old-goes-sale-150K.html


On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:42 PM Herb Mooney <herbert.mooney@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh my, what is this in? The slippery slope has already tripped me up and I'm about halfway down the slope LOL. I have boxes of radio room and cockpit items ready to set up once the radios are in that StepVan.

Virus-free.www.avg.com

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 3:55 PM B. Smith <smithab11@comcast.net> wrote:
Gotta watch out - - -  once you start assembling equipment and building radio rooms, it is a slippery slope.  
http://k4che.com/Flak%20Bait/FlakIndex/Flakbaitindex.htm




On 5/31/2023 2:16 PM, Herb Mooney wrote:
Thank you, good info for a NOOB :-) So offering a working restored BC-224 with dynamotor for a working restored or original condition BC-348 with dynamotor might be a good trade or of interest to someone of the WWII radio persuasion? This BC-224 is a beauty, but I am trying to recreate the B-29 radio room in my mobile P-30 Bomber Step-Van (bread/UPS Truck). The BC-224 isn't exactly correct for a B-29 setup.                                                                                   

Virus-free.www.avg.com                                                    

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:56 PM Doran Platt <jeepp@comcast.net> wrote:
Concur with Ray on almost all.  The non-concur is Ford vs. Chevy. I prefer the other-than J, N, and Q models. Much easier to remove the "modules".  Also, arguably easier to recap.  That said, the alignment variable caps on other than J, N, and Q models are more robust. The other than models are exhibiting split collars allowing the cap to short. The J, N, and Q models have non-shielded cans for Xtal filter and BFO.  But, when any model works, it does work. Antenna trimmer? Your call.  IMHO......
Jeep K3HVG
On 05/31/2023 11:13 AM EDT Ray Fantini <rafantini@salisbury.edu> wrote:
 
 

May be wrong but I always though the BC-224 was the twelve volt version of the BC-348 and was paired up with things like the BC-191 transmitters for ground use and the BC-348 was most frequently paired with the ART-13 for the AN/ARC-8, then again the SCR-193 for ground operation used a BC-312 with a BC-191 transmitter, BC-312 and 342 receivers were more a ground radio where the BC-224 and 348 were built lighter for air use?

I have a BC-224 just because its so weird in being twelve volt but otherwise appears the same as a 348, personally I prefer the later production run BC-348Q  over the older design 224/348 although I think all were in production at the same time. Don’t think any of them are a good retirement investment. Collect what you like or find fun to use, once you get into perceived value things go downhill fast!

 

Ray F/KA3EKH

 

 

From: mrca-bounces@mailman.qth.net <mrca-bounces@mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Herb Mooney
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 10:41 AM
To: mrca@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [MRCA] BC-224 vs BC-348

 

 

I have both, and was wondering if one or the other was more desirable from a collector standpoint. I plan to have both working eventually, the BC-224 in the shack and the BC-348 in a mobile environment, both teamed up with ART-13s.

 

Thanks,

Herb - W4BCH

 

 

 

 

______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
--
Nick England K4NYW
www.navy-radio.com