Thank you, good info for a NOOB :-) So offering a working restored BC-224 with dynamotor for a working restored or original condition BC-348 with dynamotor might be a good trade or of interest to someone of the WWII radio persuasion? This BC-224 is a beauty, but I am trying to recreate the B-29 radio room in my mobile P-30 Bomber Step-Van (bread/UPS Truck). The BC-224 isn't exactly correct for a B-29 setup.
Virus-free.www.avg.com
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:56 PM Doran Platt <[email protected]> wrote:
______________________________________________________________Concur with Ray on almost all. The non-concur is Ford vs. Chevy. I prefer the other-than J, N, and Q models. Much easier to remove the "modules". Also, arguably easier to recap. That said, the alignment variable caps on other than J, N, and Q models are more robust. The other than models are exhibiting split collars allowing the cap to short. The J, N, and Q models have non-shielded cans for Xtal filter and BFO. But, when any model works, it does work. Antenna trimmer? Your call. IMHO......Jeep K3HVGOn 05/31/2023 11:13 AM EDT Ray Fantini <[email protected]> wrote:______________________________________________________________May be wrong but I always though the BC-224 was the twelve volt version of the BC-348 and was paired up with things like the BC-191 transmitters for ground use and the BC-348 was most frequently paired with the ART-13 for the AN/ARC-8, then again the SCR-193 for ground operation used a BC-312 with a BC-191 transmitter, BC-312 and 342 receivers were more a ground radio where the BC-224 and 348 were built lighter for air use?
I have a BC-224 just because its so weird in being twelve volt but otherwise appears the same as a 348, personally I prefer the later production run BC-348Q over the older design 224/348 although I think all were in production at the same time. Don’t think any of them are a good retirement investment. Collect what you like or find fun to use, once you get into perceived value things go downhill fast!
Ray F/KA3EKH
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Herb Mooney
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 10:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MRCA] BC-224 vs BC-348
I have both, and was wondering if one or the other was more desirable from a collector standpoint. I plan to have both working eventually, the BC-224 in the shack and the BC-348 in a mobile environment, both teamed up with ART-13s.
Thanks,
Herb - W4BCH
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________ MRCA mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html