[MRCA] [ARC5] Reading Airshow AAR

B. Smith smithab11 at comcast.net
Sat Jun 13 18:35:12 EDT 2026


That's definitively a "109" Mark.
breck
k4che


On 6/13/2026 12:09 PM, Tim via MRCA wrote:
> Good on ya Mark ..That's a lot of work....You're showing the rest of 
> us how it's done...
> BZ!
> Tim
> N6CC
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 8:22 AM Mark K3MSB via ARC5 
> <arc5 at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>     Here's my attempt at a somewhat decent AAR.....
>
>     image.png
>
>     image.png
>
>     I spent 4 days at the Mid Atlantic Air Museum's World War II
>     weekend as part of a regional reenactor group. Setup was Thursday
>     June 4th with the event running Friday June 5th through Sunday
>     June 7th.
>
>     This was my second time at Reading as part of the reenactor group,
>     and the start of my second year of reenacting in general.  Weather
>     was hot and somewhat humid, but I had a nice breeze through the
>     Comms Tent on all three days.
>
>     It was great to see the B-17 “Sentimental Journey” in the skies
>     over Reading, as well as the A-26 Invader “Silver Dragon”.
>
>     Overall, I had a steady stream of visitors in the Comms Tent all
>      three days, and did numerous demos each day.
>
>     Objectives:
>     Educate people on the HF / VHF radios used on Allied Aircraft in
>     WW II.
>     Describe the differences between the SCR-274N Command Radios and
>     SCR-287 Liaison radios.
>     Demonstrate how a DF unit works.
>     Demonstrate a BC-611.
>     Explain that during the Battle of Britain, the British not only
>     had to determine the position and speed of the German aircraft,
>     but also of the British aircraft in order to formulate a least
>     time / least fuel intercept solution.
>
>
>     Equipment used:
>     SCR-274N system.  Working on 40 & 75M AM.  40/80 TX,  40/80/LF
>     RX.  New this year were two remote tuning cables and a new Pilots
>     Control box that was in better shape than my old one.  Powered by
>     a pair of 12V 100 AH Lifepo4 batteries in series.   Dynamotors
>     used for the transmitter and receivers.
>
>     SCR-287 System.  The BC-375 and 2 additional tuning units were
>     static display only. The BC-348Q was working and has it's original
>     dynamotor.  Powered by a pair of 12V lawn tractor batteries in series.
>
>     DF Setup consisting of a DU-1 and an ATA CBY-46145 Broadcast Band
>     Navigation Receiver.  Due to the lack of NDBs in the area, I did
>     not attempt to use my BC-453 Beacon Band Navigation Receiver this
>     year.  The BC-453 was in the SCR-274N rack.  The ATA receiver used
>     a dynamotor. It was powered by a pair of 12V lawn tractor
>     batteries in series (the same ones used for the BC-348Q).  HV for
>     the DU-1 was obtained from the center connector of the ATA receiver.
>
>     BC-611.  Working on 75M AM.   Used 4 D batteries and the DC-DC
>     converter that used to be made by the Italian fellow.   Worked well!
>
>     SCR-522 VHF system with BC-608 Pipsqueak unit – Display only.
>
>     Setchell Carlson BC-1206 LF Receiver.  Display only.
>
>     MN-36 Loop Antenna.  Display only.
>
>     BC-221 Frequency Meter.  Display only.
>
>
>     What did I expect to happen:
>     Use the HF radios to talk to others at the event;
>     Use the DU-1 and associated receiver to illustrate how an aircraft
>     found it's position by the DF process.
>     Use the HF radios to “talk to each other” during demos.
>
>     What Happened:
>     I made two BC-611 to BC-611 contacts with Mark WW2RDO who was also
>     at the event.
>     I made one contact with Don K3OP with my SCR-274N.  He was in the
>     parking lot with a TS-480.
>     All three contacts were on 75M AM.
>
>     Demos of the DF setup, BC-611, and SCR-274N worked extremely well
>     and was well received.
>
>
>     What went well and why:
>
>     The DF demo went well.  I had the ATA receiver tuned to an AM
>     broadcast station about 50 miles away.   I explained how the
>     operator would manually turn the DU-1 loop to find the maximum
>     signal then report the bearing to the pilot (yes, I know they went
>     for the null, but I didn't think that detail was relevant for my
>     purposes).  I explained that the DU-1 loop was normally mounted on
>     the fuselage with an extension shaft to the operator's table, and
>     I showed them the scales the radio operator used to determine the
>     bearing to the station.   I had an MN-36 Football next to the DU-1
>     for static display, and I explained that there was a loop inside
>     the MN-36 that was motorized and worked the same way as the manual
>     DU-1.
>
>     I then mentioned that our equipment tent has a Gibson Girl and
>     explained what it did, how it was used, and that downed crews were
>     found using the same DF process from land bases or flying boats. 
>     I explained these were examples of “Passive DF”.   I then
>     explained how the SCR-247N could be used by a lost pilot to get a
>     bearing to a known ground station by pushing the transmit button
>     on the Transmitter Control Box in order for a ground station to
>     give a pilot a bearing to the station.
>
>     I explained the function of the Command sets (short range air to
>     ground / air to air)  and contrasted that to the function of the
>     Liaison radios (long distance).  I showed them the inside of a
>     command receiver as many of the younger people had never seen a
>     vacuum tube.   I explained what each box did and how they could be
>     located in different parts of the airplane, and what the pilot's
>     receiver and transmitter control boxes did.
>
>     Demos were varied.
>     Transmit on the 274N and listen to the signal on the 274N receiver
>     or the BC-348Q.
>     Transmit on the BC-611 and listen to the signal on the 274N
>     receiver or the BC-348Q.
>     Feedback considerations aside, these demos worked fine and were
>     well received by the visitors.
>
>     The SCR-247N was on 3885.  Last year, my antenna was a 45 foot
>     wire that exited the CommsTent, went over the top and down the
>     other side, then ran parallel to ground around the perimeter of
>     the tent at a height of just over 6 feet.   This year, I used a
>     Hustler 75M Mobile antenna attached to one of my wife's biggest
>     baking pan (yes, with prior approval....you don't get to be
>     married for 44 years without asking about something like this
>     first....).  The assembly was hidden behind a canvas partition in
>     another part of the tent.  A counterpoise was used.   Matching was
>     accomplished by my custom box of a 4:1 UNUN and series matching
>     capacitor and MFJ Tuner.   Matching was not a problem
>
>     I explained the use of the BC-221 Frequency Meter and explained
>     how all the various radios were netted to the mission frequencies
>     before a mission.
>
>     I explained the use of the SCR-522 and how it was used alongside
>     the SCR-274N and SCR-287 radios.  I had the BC-608 “Pipsqueak”
>     unit running and explained that this was used to aid the British
>     in determining the position of their own aircraft.   I explained
>     that every minute for 14 seconds, the Pipsqueak would cause the
>     SCR-522 to send out a signal, and the ground stations would DF
>     (triangulate) on the signals to get an accurate position of the
>     Spitfires, Hurricanes, etc.   That position, combined with known
>     winds at altitude and the specific performance of the various
>     aircraft types,  the best intercept solution to intercept the
>     German aircraft would be determined. Explained this was pre IFF. 
>     Most visitors had no idea the British had to do this.  My goal was
>     to get the visitors to understand the complexity of how the
>     British got their planes to intercept the Germans;  it was a LOT
>     more complicated than “Go East young man”....... and the
>     computations were done without computers!
>
>     To tune and net the SCR-274N each morning,  I had an ICOM
>     transceiver in a plastic container under a canvas tarp on the
>     bottom shelf of my big table.  Day to day tuning of the antenna
>     was minimal, and surprisingly the radios held frequency very well
>     day to day.   Netting the SCR-247N TX to 3885 was quick using the
>     ICOMs band-scope.
>
>     What can be improved and how?
>
>     Antenna for the SCR-274N.   The mobile whip worked OK, but others
>     not on the field were unable to hear me at the appointed times. 
>     And, since I was making short transmissions during my demos (with
>     proper FCC ID.....) that may be a good thing.   I need to get a
>     wire antenna vertically up through the top of the tent then
>     horizontally to another tent.  There are non-technical reasons why
>     this is a challenge, but I will try again next time.   I enjoy
>     POTA (Parks on the Air) and I use a 55 foot wire to a 9:1 balun
>     for 40M.  No counterpoise, and it works very well.   I'm doing to
>     try that on 80M as well.  Try as I might, I've never gotten a 274N
>     transmitter to work directly to a wire regardless of using a
>     counterpoise or not.  This is why I  go from the 274N via a 4:1
>     UNUN and series matching capacitor into the MFJ tuner;  I can get
>     50 ohms unbalanced into the tuner and let the MFJ handle matching
>     whatever I put on the other end.   The visitors never see this stuff.
>
>     Build a DC-DC converter for the BC-221 so I can actually demo it. 
>     It currently runs off of 110 VAC and that doesn't do me any good
>     in the field.
>
>     Get dud tubes for the BC-375 to display them.
>
>     Have a code practice oscillator available for the young kids to
>     play with.
>
>     My mic for the SCR-274N went belly up on Sunday afternoon.  Bring
>     a second mic.
>
>     Conclusion / comments
>
>     Being able to demo the SCR-274N and BC-611 at will for people was
>     a huge success.  Most people assumed that radios were just
>     replicas until I turned on the SCR-274N and they heard the
>     dynamotors spin up.    “You mean this stuff works?”.....   “Yup,
>     let me show you”....
>
>     My setup was well received by young people.  I had kids turn the
>     DF loop if they wanted to for a “hands on” experience.
>
>     A father and daughter came into the tent.   He said his father
>     (her grandfather) was a radio operator on a B-17 during the war. 
>     I told them the radios I had were the ones he would have used.  
>     After I gave them a demo, I noted some tears starting to form in
>     the granddaughters eyes.   Encounters like this make all the time
>     and aggravation of getting these radios restored and working in
>     the field worth it.   We talked for quite a few minutes afterwards.
>
>     A young girl, maybe a teenager, came in and I gave her a demo.  
>     She then asked me “that's good, but how do you address the battery
>     issue on the BC-611?  They can't be good after so many years”.   I
>     said that was a great observation and told her about the DC-DC
>     converter inside the unit.  We talked a bit more about restoration
>     and she then said she  enjoys restoring first generation computers
>     and runs into some of the same kinds of problems I run into.   OK,
>     she's not restoring radios, but she is restoring!  That's a start!
>
>     Saturday night around sunset we had weather warnings about a
>     severe squall line that was approaching.  Heavy rain and strong
>     winds, but the line was pretty narrow.   Each night I cover my
>     radios with a vinyl tarp, even though the radios are in a zipped
>     canvass tent.    The tent is old and leaks a bit.....   So, I got
>     the tarp over the radios and we secured the tent, double checked
>     the tie downs etc.    The squall line hit and the winds were
>     strong.   All of sudden people were yelling as one of the main
>     sleeping tents that housed about 10 cots and people's belongings
>     went airborne.   Apparently wind got under the tent.  So, it was
>     all hands on deck to get the tent back over people's belongings
>     and we sat on the tent getting drenched to the skin for several
>     minutes.   We spent about an hour afterwards helping to get the
>     tent back up.... all was completely soaked.
>
>     Afterwards I realized that in the Comms tent,  under the vinyl
>     tarp, in a tight plastic box, in a small canvas bag.... was my
>     poncho..... nice and dry.....
>
>     73 Mark K3MSB
>     ______________________________________________________________
>     ARC5 mailing list
>     Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
>     Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>     Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
>
>     This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>     Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20260613/c61cd7da/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 917361 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20260613/c61cd7da/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 927003 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20260613/c61cd7da/attachment-0003.png>


More information about the MRCA mailing list