[MRCA] bC-474 Power Supply
Robert Nickels
ranickels at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 21:00:57 EDT 2025
Data is always good. I used my Clarostat 240C power decade box to vary
the load from 10ma to the point where regulation was lost. Input
voltage was 13.0VDC and the resulting current was verified with a
Keithley 2000 DMM.
Short version: After adjusting the output to 300VDC the output
voltage remained between 291 and 298V from 10 ma to 110 ma loads, which
translates to a range of 3 to 33 watts into the load. At 100ma the
heatsink temperature was 40C and the input current was 2.56A for input
power of 33.28 watts. Output voltage at 100ma was 292VDC or 29.2
watts, resulting in efficiency of 29.2/33.28 = 88%. Well within the
expected range and in my view, this is the maximum working limit.
At 120ma load current the output was down to 280VDC for 33.6 watts
output but the input current was 3.54A or 46 watts, resulting in
efficiency of only 73%. This was reflected in a rise in the heatsink
temperature to 54C. Subjectively, it also "smelled hot".
I've had failures running these things at higher voltages so 300V and
100ma are my practical limits, but that's a substantial amount of
regulated HV power! The output is clean but if you find the need for
more, normal filtering and shielding practices apply. The worst problem
I had was in powering a light aircraft receiver with a 75kHz IF - which
is right at the switching frequency! That required shielding and
physical separation to eliminate magnetic coupling. A light load of a
few ma helps with regulation at low current and you really want a
bleeder resistor anyhow (these things can bite!).
A final tip - make sure any RF loads are well bypassed - it doesn't take
much RF getting back into the board to pop the IC. I keep UC3843s and
FETs on hand for those occasions.
73, Bob W9RAN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20250626/e1296585/attachment.html>
More information about the MRCA
mailing list