[MRCA] [MMRCG] Band Changes -Moose and Squirrel Net

[Murray, Conard]

The new rules take effect 30 days after the publish date.
73,
Conard, WS4S


-----Original Message-----
From: MMRCG at groups.io <MMRCG at groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike N2MS via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 9:21 AM
To: mrca at mailman.qth.net; MMRCG at groups.io
Subject: Re: [MMRCG] [MRCA] Band Changes -Moose and Squirrel Net

External Email Warning

This email originated from outside the university. Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to requests.

________________________________

I decided to look at Al Klase' posting about the Moose and Squirrel Net and noticed he recommended the other channels as an alternate. During some events 5371.5 KHz was used and they vacated 5403.5 KHz (Channel 5) which is the designated 60-meter calling frequency:

https://www.mrca.ar88.net/Old%20Pages/Net/MandS.html

Maybe we could QSY to 5371.5 in the future.

I don't know when the rules take effect but in the past they took effect when entered into the Congressional record.

Let's discuss during today's and Saturday's net.

Mike N2MS


https://www.mrca.ar88.net/Old%20Pages/Net/MandS.html
> On 12/10/2025 5:35 PM EST mstangelo at comcast.net wrote:
>
>
> Another option is to keep at on 5357 at 15 watts but you need a quiet receiving site. I can find a quiet portable site when the weather is warm but these old bones can't take the cold weather.
>
> Mike N2MS
> > On 12/10/2025 5:26 PM EST mstangelo at comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >
> > This summer we tried 7260-62 LSB after the noontime net and conditions were better than 60. I would suggest LSB 40 because USB is tough on a narrow band such as 40.
> >
> > Another option is another 60 meter channel but some mil radios cannot support 500 hz spacing.
> >
> > Maybe we can discuss on tomorrow's and Saturday meeting.
> >
> > I do M&S because of the portable aspect and it fits well in the noontime hour.
> >
> > Mike N2MS
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 12/10/2025 5:10 PM EST Ray Fantini via MRCA <mrca at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This may be the year of change! Kind of like the idea of limiting 5357 to just 15 watts for field exercises but its a real issue for any distant stations. But then again looking at the new channel layout see a group of good new channels we can use for field and remote work on sixty. I only have one radio that is rock bound for sixty and think this is a good reason to install one of those little VXO devices.
> > > Maybe time to consider also moving the Saturday morning forty meter USB net to 7.280 to get away from the issues with some of the AM stations? Or something different? Think the QRP SSB calling channel for forty may be 7.285 but not certain. Just know that lately there have been a lot of AM QSO on 7.29 and 7.295
> > >
> > > Ray F/KA3EKH


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4814): https://groups.io/g/MMRCG/message/4814
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116730333/234682
Group Owner: MMRCG+owner at groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/MMRCG/unsub [cmurray at tntech.edu]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-