[MRCA] RF Generator wanted

Al Klase ark at ar88.net
Thu Mar 19 15:33:47 EDT 2020


Ray,

You need to collect the whole set of HP generators.  Beyound the 606 and 
608 there are a couple others that go way up into the microwaves.  Have 
an extra bedroom?

The HP-8640 has an input to the counter, so it eliminates an instrument.

Al

On 3/19/2020 3:11 PM, Ray Fantini wrote:
>
> Another Thought, if space were not an issue would look into the huge 
> heavy HP-608 would go well with my FR-38 but alas it has been 
> relegated to living inside a sealed transit container out in the garage.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ka1wwvex5o&t=36s
>
> YouTube video of when I had it in the shop. You can also see the 
> offending Motorola. Think the HP-6840 would look good next to the 
> newer HP counter.
>
> Ray F/KA3EKH
>
> *From:* mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net <mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net> 
> *On Behalf Of *Al Klase
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM
> *To:* mrca at mailman.qth.net
> *Subject:* Re: [MRCA] RF Generator wanted
>
> Ray and the group,
>
> What you're talking about is a laboratory-grade signal generator.  
> Here's a couple I know of first hand:
>
> HP-606:  Tube based, Bigger than a braedbox, LF thru HF, calibrated 
> attenuator, repairable, Most seem to work without a fuss.
>
> URM-25:  Essentially a reduced-size military version of the HP-606.  
> Many need to be recapped - that's a PITA but doable,  Small size of 
> the freq. dial is NFG for old eyes.
>
> HP-6840:  400 KHz - through UHF,  Digital readout,  AM and FM 
> modulation.  Someone mentioned the gear problem with the band switch.  
> I handle mine gingerly.  When one of these stops working it makes a 
> nice wheel chock unless you're a talented technician with a lot of 
> time on your hands.
>
> Don't discount the old-buzzard General Radio stuff.  The 1001-A and 
> the rally old 405 come to mind.
>
> The Eico/HeathKit/RadioShack things are all toys.
>
> Al
>
>
>
> On 3/19/2020 2:29 PM, Ray Fantini wrote:
>
>     Signal generation is easy, the problem now days is that I have
>     reached the point where I want to confirm receiver sensitivity at
>     different frequencies so you have to have the ability to calibrate
>     the output of the generator and a calibrated attenuator to be 100%
>     that the radio is working correctly. These early synthesized
>     radios suffer from insensitivity and in the case of USB only
>     radios when trying to copy AM if the time base in the radio is not
>     dead on it can be an issue. The GRC-106 receivers exciters
>     RT-662/834 produce an annoying heterodyne if not dead on carrier
>     when used in AM mode. They use the same product detector in USB or
>     AM with only inserting a carrier in the AM transmit mode to
>     produce a quasi AM signal.
>
>     The big Motorola 2000 series monitor produces signals at
>     calibrated levels but get the idea that the AM on it was only an
>     afterthought, when doing VHF or UHF FM its great but working on
>     this old HF/SSB stuff is requiring a different tool set. Had to
>     come up with a power meter that works down in the 2 to 30 MHz
>     range along with things like the two tone generator for testing
>     the transmitters and amplifiers, now I want to be able to provide
>     a clean low distortion AM signal for checking distortion on the
>     receive side.
>
>     Something like the things years ago when working with VHF FM stuff
>     and using the SINAD meter to tune for best audio.
>
>     Have not pulled out one of the older Motorola Service monitors or
>     a Cushman  to see if it has better AM, have been saving them for
>     you to get you working with one.
>
>     Ray F/KA3EKH
>
>     *From:* comcast <kg2bz at comcast.net> <mailto:kg2bz at comcast.net>
>     *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2020 2:08 PM
>     *To:* Scott Johnson <scottjohnson1 at cox.net>
>     <mailto:scottjohnson1 at cox.net>
>     *Cc:* Ray Fantini <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu>
>     <mailto:RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu>; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>     <mailto:milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>; MMRCG at groups.io
>     <mailto:MMRCG at groups.io>; Mrca Mailing List <MRCA at mailman.qth.net>
>     <mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net>
>     *Subject:* Re: [MRCA] RF Generator wanted
>
>     what about using an lm or bc221?
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>     On Mar 19, 2020, at 12:09 PM, Scott Johnson <scottjohnson1 at cox.net
>     <mailto:scottjohnson1 at cox.net>> wrote:
>
>         My choice, for the last thirty years, is the HP 8640B.  I
>         believe it to be among the best generators for receiver
>         measurement and alignment.  The only problem is the nylon
>         gears, which tend to shrink and crack from the brass hubs. 
>         There are people making and selling gears, and even at $300
>         for a set that, it is still worth owning one.
>
>         Options include a doubler to 1024 MHz, reverse power
>         protection (recommended),and variable frequency modulation. 
>         The Military version in the yellow case is to be avoided in my
>         opinion, as it lacks phase locking and is generally a pain in
>         the keister, unless you (like me) collect such things.
>
>         Scott V. Johnson W7SVJ
>
>         5111 E. Sharon Dr.
>
>         Scottsdale, AZ 85254-3636
>
>         H (602) 953-5779
>
>         C (480) 550-2358
>
>         scottjohnson1 at cox.net <mailto:scottjohnson1 at cox.net>
>
>         scott.johnson at ieee.org <mailto:scott.johnson at ieee.org>
>
>         *From:* mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>         <mailto:mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net>
>         <mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>         <mailto:mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net>> *On Behalf Of *Ray Fantini
>         *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2020 8:04 AM
>         *To:* milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>         <mailto:milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>; MMRCG at groups.io
>         <mailto:MMRCG at groups.io>; Mrca Mailing List
>         <MRCA at mailman.qth.net <mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net>>
>         *Subject:* [MRCA] RF Generator wanted
>
>         Everything old is new again! Been working a lot with repairing
>         a lot of GRC-106 receiver exciters and noticed that my
>         Motorola Communications Service Monitor produces a lot of
>         phase noise and poor-quality AM on the HF bands. Decided that
>         what I need is something like an old school URM-25 or maybe if
>         I can find one a URM-144/SG-823 being I already have a SG-376
>         that I got last year that I have been using a lot for SSB work.
>
>         As always not looking to spend a bunch of money on this but
>         can always do a trade. Lot of crazy prices for URM-25
>         generators on eBay but use to seeing them at Hamfest for $20
>         to $50 price range. Did not realize until recently that you
>         more often than not need vintage test equipment for working on
>         vintage radios.
>
>         It’s amazing what happens when you take modern items like the
>         new generation of digital scopes today and look at things like
>         modulation levels for AM carriers! Or operate DVM in high RF
>         environments.
>
>         Ray F/KA3EKH
>
>         ______________________________________________________________
>         MRCA mailing list
>         Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
>         Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>         Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
>         This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>         Please help support this email list:
>         http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
>     ______________________________________________________________
>
>     MRCA mailing list
>
>     Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
>
>     Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>
>     Post:mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
>     This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
>
>     Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> -- 
> Al Klase – N3FRQ
> Jersey City, NJ
> http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/

-- 
Al Klase – N3FRQ
Jersey City, NJ
http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20200319/7ee9cdcb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the MRCA mailing list