[MRCA] PRC-88 mentioned in 1980 "Infantry" magazine

Scott Johnson scottjohnson1 at cox.net
Sun Aug 16 20:24:08 EDT 2020


Amen.  I say we hit this thread with a (German) 88.

Scott V. Johnson W7SVJ
5111 E. Sharon Dr.
Scottsdale, AZ 85254-3636
H (602) 953-5779
C (480) 550-2358
scottjohnson1 at cox.net
scott.johnson at ieee.org

-----Original Message-----
From: mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net <mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Mike Morrow
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2020 5:16 PM
To: mrca at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [MRCA] PRC-88 mentioned in 1980 "Infantry" magazine

Robert wrote:

> The radio developed and apparently built by USMC was apparently called 
> AN/PRC-68, not 88.  Plus it supposedly had a synthesizer instead of 
> crystals.  Whether the photo you have is of AN/PRC-68 or not I can’t 
> say for sure but could be.  It certainly does not look like any 
> combination of AN/PRT-4(*) and AN/PRR-9.

The RT-1113/PRC-68 is extremely well-documented and very common in surplus.  Pictures and details are here and many other places:

  http://www.prc68.com/I/PRC68.shtml

I saw my first one in 1978 being used by the Marine detachment onboard the submarine tender in Holy Loch Scotland.  My personal AN/PRC-68 has a 1978 order date.  (I've used it on 51.0 MHz at several hamfests including Dayton in the past decade.)

It certainly has not even the remotest relationship to what is alleged to be the "AN/PRC-88".  I consider the AN/PRC-88 to be of very dubious veracity ...perhaps at best some kludged-together experiment.

Between 1970 and 1979 I saw Marines using the following portable tactical VHF-FM sets:

1.  AN/PRC-6 (!!!)
2.  AN/PRC-9
3.  AN/PRC-10
4.  AN/PRC-25
5.  AN/PRC-68
6.  AN/PRC-77

I never ever saw an AN/PRR-9, AN/PRT-4, or some mysterious concoction called an AN/PRC-88.  I believe the last as a deployed radio set is more fancy than fact.

I have friends who served multiple tours as U.S. Army ground-pounders in Vietnam between 1965 and 1972.  I have shown all of them the AN/PRR-9 and AN/PRT-4 and none have any recollection of using, being trained on, or even seeing those units.

I don't understand the fascination of some with the so-called but very dubious AN/PRC-88, other than its possible existence as some trials experiment...maybe.  It doesn't help how easy it is to mix up a 68 with an 88.

Mike / KK5F
______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the MRCA mailing list