[MRCA] how much power does this say?

Fri Feb 15 10:46:26 EST 2019

Eugene :

Not to criticize our learned colleagues but my reading of the meter is 75 Watts. The pointer is on the fifth mark beyond the 5.

73 de
Gene Smar AD3F

Sent from my Verizon HTC Smartphone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Peter Gottlieb" <kb2vtl at gmail.com>
To: "Ray Fantini" <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu>
Cc: "mrca at mailman.qth.net" <mrca at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [MRCA] how much power does this say?
Date: Fri, Feb 15, 2019 9:46 AM

The Bird meters have their place but still go for a lot of money. I got a HP 438 and a couple of power sensors, still in cal, for less than it would have cost me for just the extra slugs for my 43 to cover the frequencies of use to me. 
The 43 is absolutely great for old school FM land mobile radio systems. Portable, rugged, and reliable. 

Peter

On Feb 15, 2019, at 9:15 AM, Ray Fantini <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu> wrote:

Wow, that’s mind blowing! You never learned how to read an analog meter? We old timers were borne with a thru line in our hands. I remember that on the old commercial
license test that you had to read pictures of meters and write down the answers. The Bird model 43 thru line is at least for me the standard that everything else is compared to, although I do know that they have not been teaching analog meters for some years
now.
The great advantage of that meter is you can read power in the direction that the arrow is pointing so you can read forward power in one direction and flip the
element and read reflected in the other and get an indication of how efficient the match between source and load is. By knowing forward and reflected power you can calculate return loss and SWR. When used with a dummy load with no reflected power and with
good elements you can read forward power to a degree that the FCC considers accurate. They use to use the same meter themselves.
The 43 dose fall down when you get into checking PEP on a SSB radio but the one in the picture has the peak reading option that’s used for SSB measurements, also
they are not considered accurate for use in digital systems but still now that you have been exposed think that you will soon discover that your life won’t be complete without one. Most of us have several and at least a dozen or so slugs.
That’s another issue is that for different power levels and different bands, HF, VHF and UHF different slugs are required but the 43 also has convenient holes
in the case so you can mount a couple spare slugs for different power levels or frequency ranges.
In the past several years I have been forced to move to an Agilent forty four hundred series digital power meter for any stuff at work but still carry my Bird
43 as the go to meter.

Ray F/KA3EKH

From: mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of W2HX

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 8:03 AM

To: mrca at mailman.qth.net

Subject: Re: [MRCA] how much power does this say?

Thanks to everyone who replied. 70W it is! Thanks

Sent from
Nine

From: W2HX

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 7:22 AM

To: mrca at mailman.qth.net

Subject: [MRCA] how much power does this say?

Hi friends, I do not own a bird meter so I am not familiar with how to read the scales. This picture shows a meter with a 250W slug. The meter seems to show either
7W on the lowest scale, 15W on the center scale and 30W on the highest scale. 

The lowest scale looks like it goes to a maximum of 25W. If the scale is intended to be 10X then it would show 70W. Maybe this is the answer? thanks

______________________________________________________________
MRCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20190215/74713548/attachment.html>