[MRCA] MRCA Digest, Vol 145, Issue 18
N5912J
n5912j at comcast.net
Wed May 25 11:04:39 EDT 2016
Re: TCZ
We had a TCZ aboard the Diesel sub Tench (SS-417) out of New London Squadron 2 in 1963 along with a TCS set and main transmitter TBL for HF. Rick K8PJQ RM1 SS
Sent from my iPad
> On May 25, 2016, at 2:27 AM, mrca-request at mailman.qth.net wrote:
>
> Send MRCA mailing list submissions to
> mrca at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> mrca-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> mrca-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MRCA digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Dayton 3885 Net (w8au at sssnet.com)
> 2. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (Mike Morrow)
> 3. Re: Dayton 3885 Net (grasshopper)
> 4. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (WA5CAB at cs.com)
> 5. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (WA5CAB at cs.com)
> 6. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (WA5CAB at cs.com)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:31:23 -0400
> From: w8au at sssnet.com
> To: "mrca at mailman.qth.net" <mrca at mailman.qth.net>, Military Surplus
> Mail List <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID: <mailman.35543.1464157644.10833.mrca at mailman.qth.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 10:29 AM 5/24/2016, Ray Fantini wrote:
>> A couple of pictures of the 3885 AM Net at Dayton including the Net
>> Control radios and the group picture right after the net. If anyone
>> wants higher resolution or additional images contact me off list.
> Send MRCA mailing list submissions to
> mrca at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> mrca-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> mrca-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MRCA digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Dayton 3885 Net (w8au at sssnet.com)
> 2. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (Mike Morrow)
> 3. Re: Dayton 3885 Net (grasshopper)
> 4. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (WA5CAB at cs.com)
> 5. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (WA5CAB at cs.com)
> 6. Re: [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net (WA5CAB at cs.com)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:31:23 -0400
> From: w8au at sssnet.com
> To: "mrca at mailman.qth.net" <mrca at mailman.qth.net>, Military Surplus
> Mail List <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID: <mailman.35543.1464157644.10833.mrca at mailman.qth.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 10:29 AM 5/24/2016, Ray Fantini wrote:
>> A couple of pictures of the 3885 AM Net at Dayton including the Net
>> Control radios and the group picture right after the net. If anyone
>> wants higher resolution or additional images contact me off list.
>
> Tnx for the pix!
>
> Do you see the ghost image of the person not there? ;-) Checked in
> with my BC-611 but
> due to having to watch my "store" in the flea market could not make
> it for the pix.
>
> Nice to see the NCS setup. Who would imagine an ART-13 as a field
> portable? :-[
>
> 73,
> Perry w8au
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:51:15 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
> From: Mike Morrow <kk5f at earthlink.net>
> To: "mrca at mailman.qth.net" <mrca at mailman.qth.net>, Military Surplus
> Mail List <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID:
> <96209.1464123075974.JavaMail.wam at elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Perry wrote:
>
>> Who would imagine an ART-13 as a field portable?
>
> Yes, along with the R-105*/ARR-15 to make most of an AN/ARC-25. (Plus, an R-23A/ARC-5 should be incuded as well, since the R-105* does NOT cover anything below 1.5 MHz.)
>
> The R-105/ARR-15 was missing its MT-461/ARR-15 mount and C-733A/ARR-15A control panel. Both of those have always been very hard to find. I've owed a receiver since 1968, but in the 48 years since, I have only managed to get one mount and control panel...about 15 years ago.
>
> Mike / KK5F
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 18:23:42 -0400
> From: "grasshopper" <grasshopper at epix.net>
> To: <w8au at sssnet.com>, <mrca at mailman.qth.net>, "'Military Surplus Mail
> List'" <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID: <mailman.35544.1464157644.10833.mrca at mailman.qth.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Wasn't it always portable?? Aeronautic and Shipboard!!
>
> Kd3ht
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MRCA [mailto:mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
> w8au at sssnet.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:31 PM
> To: mrca at mailman.qth.net; Military Surplus Mail List
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] Dayton 3885 Net
>
> At 10:29 AM 5/24/2016, Ray Fantini wrote:
>> A couple of pictures of the 3885 AM Net at Dayton including the Net
>> Control radios and the group picture right after the net. If anyone
>> wants higher resolution or additional images contact me off list.
>
> Tnx for the pix!
>
> Do you see the ghost image of the person not there? ;-) Checked in
> with my BC-611 but
> due to having to watch my "store" in the flea market could not make
> it for the pix.
>
> Nice to see the NCS setup. Who would imagine an ART-13 as a field
> portable? :-[
>
> 73,
> Perry w8au
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 18:53:17 -0400
> From: WA5CAB at cs.com
> To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net, mrca at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID: <928e1d.433c623f.4476355d at cs.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I would vote no for both it and the earlier AN/MRC-20. Although you might
> be able to hump a T-47 on a pack board, one of the antennas is probably not
> doable.
>
> In a message dated 05/24/2016 16:00:06 PM Central Daylight Time,
> navy.radio at gmail.com writes:
>> Does the AN/MRC-35A count? BC-348 + ART-13 in a (non-airborne) M38A1
>> jeep...
>> http://www.virhistory.com/navy/manuals/mc/mrc35a-man-5702.pdf
>>
>> Nick England K4NYW
>>
>> www.navy-radio.com
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Mike Morrow <kk5f at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> Perry wrote:
>>>
>>>> Who would imagine an ART-13 as a field portable?
>>>
>
> Robert & Susan Downs - Houston
> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
> MVPA 9480
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20160524/0950cab6/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:01:22 -0400
> From: WA5CAB at cs.com
> To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net, mrca at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID: <92da0b.5c5d656f.44764552 at cs.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I've not seen anything indicating that they ever were. The TCZ was used on
> large vessels and the Navy used the AN/ARC-4 in vehicles and small craft
> (like PT boats). I haven't seen any indication of any usage of other aircraft
> or vehicular sets used shipboard until the RT-68 with PP-1175/SR followed
> by the RT-524 (specifically AN/VRC-46) with some batch of shop-built 24 volt
> supplies). These latter two were only used by the Amphibs (LPH, LPD, etc.)
>
> Robert Downs - Houston
> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
> MVPA 9480
>
> In a message dated 05/24/2016 18:41:46 PM Central Daylight Time,
> navy.radio at gmail.com writes:
>> Fair enough. And it would take more than 1 Marine to carry the entire
>> M38A1....
>>
>>
>> Relating to another commenter - how often and for what reason was the
>> BC-348 found shipboard?
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:53 PM, WA5CAB--- via Milsurplus <
>> milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>>>> I would vote no for both it and the earlier AN/MRC-20. Although you
>>> might be able to hump a T-47 on a pack board, one of the antennas is
>>> probably not doable.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> 75A/sR
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20160524/fd6d89b5/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 02:27:16 -0400
> From: WA5CAB at cs.com
> To: mrca at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] [Milsurplus] Dayton 3885 Net
> Message-ID: <e899.75999fbd.44769fc4 at cs.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> OK. I sit corrected. With four RAO-7's and a RAK-6 on board, wonder what
> they needed the BC-348 for? What Class ship was it?
>
> Robert Downs - Houston
>
> In a message dated 05/24/2016 19:29:08 PM Central Daylight Time,
> navy.radio at gmail.com writes:
>> I have a Radio Equipment Log (NS 900,039) from an unknown ship -
>>
>> Only a few weekly reports are filled in mostly for Oct-Nov 1951, but there
>> are some entries for March 1954
>>
>> Receivers listed for Radio Central are:
>> RAO-7 #1
>> RAO-7 #2
>> RAO-7 #3
>> RAO-7 #4
>>
>> BC-348-J (serial no 925)
>>
>> RAK-6
>> RBH-1
>> RBK-15
>> Transmitters listed for Transmitter Room are
>> TBM-10
>> TDE-2
>> TDE-3
>> TAJ-19
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:01 PM, WA5CAB--- via Milsurplus <
>> milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>>>> I've not seen anything indicating that they ever were. The TCZ was
>>> used on large vessels and the Navy used the AN/ARC-4 in vehicles and small
>>> craft (like PT boats). I haven't seen any indication of any usage of other
>>> aircraft or vehicular sets used shipboard until the RT-68 with PP-1175/SR
>>> followed by the RT-524 (specifically AN/VRC-46) with some batch of
>>> shop-built 24 volt supplies). These latter two were only used by the Amphibs
>>> (LPH, LPD, etc.)
>>>
>>> Robert Downs - Houston
>>> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
>>> MVPA 9480
>>>
>>> In a message dated 05/24/2016 18:41:46 PM Central Daylight Time,
>>> navy.radio at gmail.com writes:
>>>>>> Relating to another commenter - how often and for what reason was the
>>>> BC-348 found shipboard?
>>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20160525/b229f010/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> MRCA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of MRCA Digest, Vol 145, Issue 18
> *************************************
More information about the MRCA
mailing list