[MRCA] Gilbert Field Antenna Caution and Warning
WA5CAB--- via MRCA
mrca at mailman.qth.net
Tue Sep 23 22:46:46 EDT 2014
Anything new enough to have to worry about co-location problems is also new
enough to bring the owner/operator to the attention of the modern day
Gestapo. And too new to be discussing here. Avoid it and you won't have either
problem.
Robert Downs - Houston
wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
In a message dated 09/23/2014 17:13:23 PM Central Daylight Time,
w2hx at w2hx.com writes:
> Hi Breck, et. al. That was me! My Harris RF-5020 gives S meter readings
> and it read S9+90. You are, of course, correct about close co-location of
> transmitters. My hunch is, after a certain generation of radios, the "newer"
> ones had very good protection in the front ends. After all, in a combat
> environment, you can't exactly tell the other guy to move further away, hihi.
> In my Harris, it has very stout PIN diodes to protect the front end. I can
> do some math, but based on 65V worth of pin diode protection, that is
> something like 80W directly injected into the receiver. I wouldn't try it,
> however. But your point is well taken. Some of the radios we use are likely
> not to have such good protection (or any for that matter)!
>
> 73 Eugene W2HX
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MRCA [mailto:mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of B. Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:41 PM
> To: mrca at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [MRCA] Gilbert Field Antenna Caution and Warning
>
> When I checked into the HF field exercise last Friday I heard one station
> mention that the nearby station was "90 db" over S9 or something similar.
> How he measured that I have no idea. :-) I caution those that set up in
> the field particularly in groups to be aware of the strong RF fields present
> from near by sets. ( no this is not a lecture on RF safety) but a warning
> that is easy to burn out or blow the front end of those expensive modern
> radios. Its very hard to replace the front end device (FET's etc) on the
> older radios with discrete components but it is a nightmare on the newer
> radios, some of which have sealed modules.
>
> When the other nearby station transmits disconnect your antenna or
> ground it, turning the set off may not be a solution. Be especially
> careful when setting up your portable antenna near a fixed wire antenna.
> Good rule of thumb if the other operator is within hailing distance (you
> can hear them with out a radio) then that is close and precautions should be
> taken.
>
> The same precautions should be taken when mounting antennas on a military
> vehicle, on some mobile installations I have measure a several tenths of a
> watt in dissimilar antennas that were close to each other with power
> levels in the typical mobile range. On my military vehicle I would lower the
> antennas that were not in use so that they were not vertical and parallel
> with the active antenna.
>
> Z
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20140923/6892a4b8/attachment.html>
More information about the MRCA
mailing list