[MRCA] B & W AC-2-22
D. Platt
jeepp at comcast.net
Fri May 24 09:44:23 EDT 2013
Gentlemen,
As a fairly long-term user of several of the 90' versions of this
antenna, let me just add my anecdotal findings. The antenna does
function as a wide-band antenna fairly well from 3 MHz to about 25 MHz.
Below 3 MHz it fails to do much of anything and the VSWR rises
rapidly. I'm in an organization that utilizes ALE and this antenna
does provide broadband coverage. Does it outperform anything short of a
wet string? Yes, it does. I've found that wet strings are unreliable,
in all cases. I have read that the antenna works best as a sloper,
although my setup is as a horizontal dipole.
Now, that said, let me add some additional observations. Someone
mentioned high power as being a requirement for success with this, and
similar antennas. My experience using a Motorola 100 watt MICOM SSB ALE
radio is less that satisfactory. Using the above combination, the ERP
(VSWR, losses, et al) amounts to values from about 20 watts, upwards to
maybe... maybe 60-70 watts. Understand that the Motorola has a fixed,
50 Ohm output Z. Thus, except for when propagation conditions are
optimum, the setup is generally unreliable. I contrast this with what
I use (normally) for point-to-point HF communications and on these same
frequencies of interest. In this case, I use an ERP of about 400 watts
via resonant antennas. I find that reliability rises to a point of
being totally useful. Now, I also use the B&W, when necessary, with
truly decent results. The power level is the key. I've tried to
explain this to our "higher" but with little or no success. The
Motorola equipment was funded and procured and that's what we have...
end of message...... So, as Patton was want to say... "Well, they have
their schedules and I have mine". I'll continue to use what works...
Jeep - K3HVG
More information about the MRCA
mailing list