[MRCA] Most Useless Radio

[Tim]

Would a KenYaeIc XYZ qualify?
;0)

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:19 PM, W2HX <w2hx at w2hx.com> wrote:

> LOVE IT!
>
>
> 73 Eugene W2HX
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of B Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 4:01 PM
> To: MRCA
> Subject: [MRCA] Most Useless Radio
>
> This year at the Gilbert meet I think it will be necessary to reinstate a
> judging category. .  .
> In the past we have had  an unofficial award for the the "Most Useless
> Radio or Set/System". .  .  . and I've featured  same on my web pages.
> I realize that in past years Rob Flory has won the "Most Useless Radio
> Award numerous times and  has in my opinion  displayed and attempted to
> operate  some of the most obscure  military communications equipment that I
> have ever seen. One year it was some sort of UHF  auto tune  repeater or
> point to point comm set(Navy of course)  in several stacks, another year it
> was very large and heavy Hallicrafters  VHF receiver that created a hazard
> in the Howard building because of the way the table was bending in the
> middle and members were afraid to go near the table. The set was
> accompanied by a WWII code tape gizmo that read tape and must have weighed
> 60 pounds Flory won twice that year and discouraged others from even
> entering the event in the following years.
>
> http://k4che.com/MRCA06/Page%201/MRCAdale%20%202006%20032.jpg
>
> http://k4che.com/MRCA05/M2005photos/MVC-151F.JPG
>
> and you can scroll to the bottom of this page for a short video.
> http://k4che.com/MRCA05/MRCA2005page1.htm
>
>
>
> And of course Lance Corporal Flory   continues to bring equipment that
> is not on any recognizable MRCA frequency.
>
> Anyway enuf of this falderal  -  -  -  to be eligible  for the "Most
> Useless Radio" category the Radio /Set/System  will  be judged under the
> following criteria.
> The Top Ten Criteria are:
>
> 1. Is the radio/set  functional? It must be somewhat functional.
>
> 2. Is it heavy?
>
> 3.  Is it very heavy?
>
> 4. Is it hard to transport.
>
> 5. Is it very hard to transport.
>
> 6. Is the frequency range strange and useless for normal MRCA
> communications.
>
> 7. Is the set hard to operate and not "user friendly"?
>
> 8. Does the set have "zero" resell value.
>
> 9.  Does the set make visitors blink and shield their eyes when they go
> near the display.
>
> 10. And finally as a bonus do visitors get nauseous when they view the
> display.
>
> Z
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>