[MRCA] Fw: CODAR IX Should be gone now thanks toeveryone's assistance.

[Peter Gottlieb]

BPL, CODAR, LightSquared... yet they have such strict EMI and licensing 
regs.



On 7/20/2011 5:39 PM, Clarke, Tom AIR4.0P NATOPS wrote:
> Or the result of a politically appointed lawyer, instead of an engineer
> to run the FCC. Just look at the "goat rope" that the GPS vs.
> LightSquared has turned into!
>
> Tom/W4OKW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Gottlieb [mailto:nerd at verizon.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:59 PM
> To: mrca at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [MRCA] Fw: CODAR IX Should be gone now thanks toeveryone's
> assistance.
>
> Another case of the FCC asleep at its watch.  CODAR should never have
> been allowed.
>
>
>
> On 7/17/2011 5:33 PM, Dennis wrote:
>>>  From Brian KW6J, the below.
>> The dreaded 60mtrsweeper is gone as of July15.
>>
>>    Dennis Starks
>> Military-Radio-Guy
>> KB0SFP
>> Monitor(all USB):
>> 3996, 5403.5, 7296, 14342.5, 18157.5
>>
>>> Sent:  Friday, July 15, 2011 9:25 PM
>>> Subject: CODAR IX Should be gone now thanks to everyone's assistance.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Friday July 15, 2011
>>>>
>>>>    Howdy all,
>>>>      As of today Rutgers University CODAR team has  moved all eight
> of their
>>> sites from 5.375 MHz which was causing us the 60 Meter  interference,
> to 4.900
>>> MHz thus solving the problem.
>>>> A hearty  thanks to Josh Kohut, Ethan Handel and the rest of the
> Rutgers
>>> CODAR team for  their support and cooperation in testing and taking
> action to
>>> solve our 60 Meter  interference problem.
>>>> Thank you Gentlemen !
>>>>
>>>> An  equally hearty thanks goes to everyone who participated in the
>>> monitoring, data  gathering and reporting that led to the success of
> this
>>> effort.
>>>>    At the beginning of this effort I received reports from Costa
> Rica, Hawaii,
>>> Alaska, Wake Island and other distant locations.  I'm not sure if the
> problem
>>> has been solved at these locations since I didn't receive monitoring
>>> information during our test periods but if you are still plagued by
> CODAR on 60
>>> Meters you might try contacting the Ocean Sciences department of your
> local
>>> University and discuss the problem
>>>> with them.
>>>>
>>>>    If  the CODAR is no longer causing interference at the distant
> locations
>>> then that  is evidence of the phenomena propagation characteristics
> on 60 Meters
>>> which we  noted during our test periods.
>>>> 73&   the best of 60  Meter DX to all of you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dan Welch - W6DFW
>>>>    Official Observer Coordinator
>>>> ARRL Orange Section
>>>> Email: arrl.ooc at apex-scientific.com
>>>>    ============================================
>>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> MRCA mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>