[Motorola] ASTRO - C4FM vs CQPSK?

tvsjr at tvsjr.com tvsjr at tvsjr.com
Wed Jun 10 14:59:24 EDT 2009


The TX side is always C4FM. QPSK-C has advantages in a simulcast setting only. Unless you have a need for it (you'd know), leave it C4FM.

------Original Message------
From: Coote, Jay
Sender: motorola-bounces at mailman.qth.net
To: Discussion of equipment manufactured by Motorola
ReplyTo: Discussion of equipment manufactured by Motorola
Subject: [Motorola] ASTRO - C4FM vs CQPSK?
Sent: Jun 10, 2009 13:48

Has anyone observed coverage differences between C4FM versus CQPSK, on
simplex and handheld? 
Is one better or are both equal?
 
Thanks,
Jay
 
 
______________________________________________________________
Motorola mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/motorola
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Motorola at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


More information about the Motorola mailing list