[Motorola] Re: MTR-2000 Questions

[Dick]

AMEN!!!!

Dick W1NMZ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glenn Little WB4UIV" <glennmaillist at bellsouth.net>
To: "Discussion of equipment manufactured by Motorola" 
<motorola at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: 04 February, 2005 13:56
Subject: Re: [Motorola] Re: MTR-2000 Questions


>A good site manager will require an isolator. This keeps everyone good 
>neighbors and helps reduce RF pollution.
>
> However there are not many good site managers. They are after the rent 
> money.
>
> If all fixed RF emitters were required to have functioning isolators, the 
> RF spectrum would be MUCH cleaner.
>
> 73
> Glenn
> WB4UIV
>
>
>
> At 01:55 AM 02/04/05, you wrote:
>>Isolators being or not being, or single or dual type,
>>depends of the situation of the transmitter site. If
>>there are many and strong RF signals you'll probably
>>need the dual type.
>>
>>The isloators stops RF from other transmitters
>>entering your MTR2000 that could create mixing of
>>signals that would interfere with other frequencies.
>>
>>Isolators doesn't do much for the MTR2000 own performance, thats the 
>>duplexers job.
>>
>>Ubbe.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: "Coote, Jay" <jcoote at ci.arcadia.ca.us>
>>
>>I have questions regarding the MTR-2000 800-MHz repeater.
>>I do not understand Motorola's options and wonder if the repeater really
>>needs a "Dual Isolator"
>>The repeater will be used in analog FM service, on a single channel pair.
>>The isolator is more expensive than a good duplexer.
>>Thanks,
>>Jay
>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>Motorola mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/motorola
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>>Post: mailto:Motorola at mailman.qth.net
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Motorola mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/motorola
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:Motorola at mailman.qth.net
>