[Motorola] HT-1000 antenna question

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:38:57 -0400 (EDT)

Well, when it was in use by the agency that used it it was on 155 MHz, but
has anyone had any success with the shorter antenna?  I guess that is
whatI am looking for.

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, david intchell wrote:

> THE BEST ANTENNA U COULD USE FOR THAT TYPE OF OPERATION IS A DIPLOE THEY =
ARE=20
> VERY COMMON AND  LONG AND ARE THE BEST FOR THAT TYPE OF STUFF BUT A BIT=
=20
> ACQURED TO GET USED TO. -DAVID  {HOPE THIS HELPS}
>=20
>=20
> >From: JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[email protected]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: [Motorola] HT-1000 antenna question
> >Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:02:45 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> >Good evening everyone. I have  a question about the antenna with the
> >HT-1000, and the Expo.  I have been trying to see how well the HT-1000
> >works with 2-meters and it is quite obvious I need to add some length to
> >that antenna here.  I am using 5-watts, but I can't seem to get the Expo=
's
> >antenna to work in the HT-1000.  The antenna from the Expo is a bit
> >longer, and appears to have the same connector, but I can't get it to wo=
rk
> >in the 1000.  Are there any other antennas that may be longer that might
> >work with the HT-1000?  Any help would be appreciated, and thanks in
> >advance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Motorola mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/motorola
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world=92s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.=20
> http://www.hotmail.com
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Motorola mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/motorola
>=20