I see in old magazine ads the BC-348 sold consistently for around $10 over the BC-342 price.

What accounts for this difference, do you think ?

That the BC-348 was lighter ? More “attractive” looking ?

The selectivity on the BC-342 had to be better.

The “old style” crystal filter on the older models BC-224 and -348 look to me smarter than either

the BC-342/ 344 or the later models BC-348, but of course at 915 kcs. it’s about twice as wide as

at 470 kcs.

-Hue Miller