I am pleasantly surprised at all the interest in the BC-221 and its' variants. I wrote up an article for Electric Radio back in the spring and sent it off to Ray . I have not seen it in print yet, but I took a semi deep dive into the BC-221 and looked at the typical accuracies that were possible with such a meter today. One thing that I found was that the VFO coils had drifted somewhat, so that the calibration books did not align with the errors inherent in the tuning capacitor, so I found a way to bring the crystal checkpoints back in line with where they were in 1944. A few folks thought I was crazy to expend so much energy with obsolete tech. (I put up no defense) My interest was just what you guys are now discussing. I wanted to see how good it could be. Re calibrating the coil and capacitor improved the accuracy a bit. It was not earth shaking, but I found that the original books along with a BC-221 that had a regulated AC supply and was not bouncing around in a B-17 at 18,000 ft could produce accuracy much better than advertised. The manual states 0.034% at 4.000 MHz. I was seeing accuracies of well under 0.01 % in a controlled environment. Many measurements were at 0.003%. A few spots produced larger errors and I attribute that to errors in the calibration book itself. I found some mistakes there as I re checked my unit against the book. I found myself easily making mistakes re calibrating the thing as well. After awhile you can go cross-eyed looking at that dial. It is not an easy job.
I have two BC-221s, an "N" version and an "M" version. I re packed all the bath tub caps and looked for other bad components. Not much goes wrong with them. The two versions needed different techniques to re calibrate the VFO coils, but it was possible and simple to do. Basically I used metal near the coils to tweak the inductance. One unit was low, while the other was high! BC-221s are a lot of fun.
Dave K1WHS
Hi
You can (with some care) measure the frequency of an LM or BC-221 to at least “as good as” the original calibration setup. I came across the frequency standard rack from one many years ago. It was state of the art back then. We’ve moved on.
The other side of the process is very accurately “spinning the dial”. You can build up a fancy drive setup. Most folks don’t go that far. Without it, it’s *very* tedious to get enough points to do as good a job as they did “back in the day”. The tuning capacitor isn’t quite as linear as one might think ….
Yes, this is really a “that depends” sort of thing.
Is a cal book that’s “close” good enough? For a lot of things it most certainly is.
What on earth are we comparing to?
How accurate is that 80 year old cal book today? Does the meter still have the same tubes in it as when it went through cal? (some very much look like they do). How much does the cal book change when you swap tubes? How long do you keep the unit powered up before you use it? Do you “trust” the crystal or do you zero it with every use? If so how do you do it?
Lots and lots of rabbit holes to wander down.
Bob
On Sep 3, 2025, at 1:40 PM, Bill KA8VIT <[email protected]> wrote:
______________________________________________________________These days you can easily recreate the CAL book using an NanoVNA.There was an article posted about it somewhere, (I thought here).73 - BILL KA8VIT / W8COD====================================
Bill Chaikin, KA8VIT
Chief Radio Operator
WW2 Submarine USS COD SS-224 (NECO)On 09/03/2025 1:44 AM EDT Bill Pileggi <[email protected]> wrote:The LM and BC series frequency meters might be more popular than we think... I had one stolen from my table at the Sellersville, PA hamfest sometime between 2010 and 2020. Absolutely astonished me. The meter did NOT have the CAL book on the front, I had the CAL book with me in electronic format (it's a complicated story as to why I didn't have the physical CAL book (for this serial number) ). The CAL book remains in my electronic archives...Bill KA3AIS
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________ Milsurplus mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html