______________________________________________________________I am confused why in the write up on the SCR 506 that Ray quoted that it
said: "but takes the patience of Job to sort out the millions of tuning units"
What tuning units....the SCR 506 didn't use any tuning units.
The BC 191 in the SCR 193 that it replaced used a few tuning units
The radios IMO opinion that used a lot of tuning units were the GF/RU and
SCR 183/283 radios...and the BC 375 to a lesser extent but still a few.
Paul
N6FEG
Think that because the transmitter had four preset channels and for each preset there was a setting for the master oscillator, driver tuning, PA and antenna tuning that resulted in about a thousand adjustments for the preset channels. Go figure, receiver has no presets but transmitter had four? Maybe that’s because they would allow the operator to tune the receiver but not attempt to tune the transmitter due to the complexity of operation? So, the operator would tune the receiver but use preset channels for transmitting with someone further up the chain doing the transmitter tuning? Often wonder how that worked with radios like the TCS where if you had people with no idea how to tune the transmitter and how unexperienced (but often higher ranking) crew members were kept from cranking on the transmitter.
All this is speculation on the SCR-506 transmitter because I have not seen one yet.
Ray F/KA3EKH
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html