OK, Ken, thanks for the reply.  Have enjoyed the articles on your website for many years. I stand corrected, you were talking about the RAK.

The article I was referencing is titled "Single Signal Reflexed Regenerative Receiver" by SV3ORA. A web search brings it up.

He uses some old slide pots that have a worm gear and knob for regen control.  Old analog TV tuner parts.

Your comments really got my notice !

Best 73,

Alan, N3BJ
































On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 3:40 PM Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006@frontier.com> wrote:
On 23 Oct 2023 at 14:35, Alan Fryer wrote:

>
> Ken's comments about "single signal" performance with the RAL reminded
> me of an article that explained how very precise control of
> regeneration can create that effect.  IIRC, the theory goes that one
> sideband was just barely in the oscillating mode (maximum selectivity)
> and the other sideband was not in oscillation, attenuating it. 
> Regeneration control is frequency sensitive, maybe this is an
> optimization of that ? .  I'll dig up the article and reference it to
> you all.
>
> Does this make any sense ?

Well, yes, but I was talking about the RAK, not the RAL.

I never noticed any "single signal" effect with my RAL. The RAL is HF, 300 Kc to 23 Mc. The
RAK is VLF, 14 Kc up to 600 Kc.

With my RAK, the "other side" of zero-beat simply isn't there...at all.

Ken W7EKB