[Milsurplus] Of BC-611 Interest, maybe
B. Smith
smithab11 at comcast.net
Fri Aug 28 13:44:49 EDT 2026
I had a couple of those empty display cases and could not resist
filling one with OTS components and creating a solid state BC-611.
K4CHE
http://k4che.com/BC-611%20Knockoff/BC-611%20Knockoff.htm
On 8/27/2026 10:56 PM, Hubert Miller via Milsurplus wrote:
>
> I wanted to briefly see what SCR-536 radios are going for, and i see
> it’s enough that i’m thinking about
>
> hoarding mine a bit longer, being more cautious. But i discovered this
> interesting site, which compares
>
> the real thing with a ‘What Price Glory’ replica. Which does not see
> to be overpriced at all.
>
> http://www.90thidpg.us/Equipment/Reviews/WPGBC611/index.html
>
> Also there’s a page-2 which recounts the author’s effort to make the
> WPG talkie more realistic, compared
>
> to the original.
>
> http://www.90thidpg.us/Equipment/Reviews/WPGBC611/DeFarb.html
>
> I wish now i had stocked up on more spare parts. I think Robert Downs
> is out of the businesss.
>
> I have 2 of an earlier talkie which emulates a BC-611 but is plastic,
> CB channel, and ¾ size. I wanted to
>
> draw the schematic and maybe convert freq but i must have run into
> something more pressing, cuz i set it
>
> aside.
>
> I recall maybe less than a decade ago a fellow was selling 2 BC-611 on
> Ebay, that he had “converted to solid
>
> state”. The receiver part, which i think i may have the plan docs for,
> was a piece of cake, using FETs. I somehow
>
> missed getting the trans part of the process, either i was too late or
> the guy didn’t release that. I suspect the trans
>
> work was not the smartest conversion, i suspect it lowered output
> power by a magnitude maybe, i seem to
>
> recollect 400 foot range, altho i would not bet money on this memory.
> I wrote the fellow – a ham – to try to get
>
> any insight on how he handled the trans conversion. No answer. I think
> you have to preserve the high resistance
>
> high voltage basic circuit to keep the transmit power. If you have
> ideas on this, i would love to know your approach.
>
> Tube purists: i have way too many families of tubes for my radios. Way
> too many, and they’re continually suspect,
>
> as far was wearing out. “ T U B E “ = “Temporarily Useful Bulbous
> Expedient”.
>
> OH yeah: a fellow with gradeschool years in Nederlands showed me once
> a BC-611 he had picked up out of a
>
> roadside ditch after Arnhem. It had the antenna broken off – no quick
> change possible with this rig – and it had
>
> a hand applied different shade of brown paint spiraling up around the
> thing. He had replaced the antenna and the thing looked perfect. I
> should have maybe stayed in touch with him.
>
> -Hue Miller
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list