[Milsurplus] Aviation AM vs FM
Charlie L.
mjcal79 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 31 12:19:20 EDT 2025
After 6 years with the Navy, in 1977 I went to work for the FAA as a
technician for the next 33. At that time, the first thing you do is start
at page one no matter what your experience level with a correspondence
course known as the DFF 100. So, with 'This is an atom' , for the third
time, got educated again in electronics. After that, the next thing you do
is communications, all the way back to Sam Morse and into spark and arc
transmitters, crystal sets, regen, super regen, super hets, all the way up
to the current era. The very first thing discussed when they finally got
to voice modulation is AM over FM and a lot of research was done in this
area by very high level thinkers. SSB was brought up, and as this was
even more complex than FM, dismissed entirely, but is still used in long
distance overseas comm. In black and white in the books I had, it said
clearly, AM was used because of the simplicity of the receiver circuits, it
offered of from of communication check sum in that two carriers made a
heterodyne so you know somebody was interfered with and to repeat the
message, and that the capture effect of FM was a risk factor. AM was/is
deemed 'safer'. Today, the simple diode detector is long gone, with much
more complicated circuits and component level, the freq stability in
modern aviation gear is so good that most times you don't get a heterodyne,
what you do get is similar to the old telco party line, you can hear two,
or more people talking at once and you know to sort them out, and FM is
still considered too risky. Maybe the idea of AM vs FM will change on how
to communicate with a plane, but nothing will be as simple and foolproof as
plain AM. Around 2010 the FAA decided they no longer needed the backup
microwave link system that they had just spent tens of millions of our tax
dollars on to update and make more reliable by adding more repeater sites,
a system that was spread out all over the country. Now, they put all
their eggs in the telco basket, the modern FAA is known to take chances to
save a buck, just hope you are not in an aircraft when those go cheap ideas
collapse.
Charlie in NC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20250731/41011947/attachment.html>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list