[Milsurplus] Dynamotor brushes

Jim Whartenby old_radio at aol.com
Sun Jul 6 02:22:29 EDT 2025


Somewhere I have an an original envelope with spare dynamotor brushes.  Each brush was labeled plus or minus, LV or HV so each brush was somehow different from the other three.
Jim

Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.  Murphy 

    On Saturday, July 5, 2025 at 07:05:26 PM CDT, Charlie L. <mjcal79 at gmail.com> wrote:   

 One thing about using dynamotors with your milsurp, they last a very long time on the ground, compared to  operating at up to 30K feet in unpressurised planes where  they arced like the dickens up there.  A contact I have who restores electrically operated turrets for WWII AC like the B17, said he has never replaced the brushes in the amplidynes that power those turret motors.  That also brings up a question as to  their composition.  I wonder if those brushes intended for high altitude, had a different make up than those used in motors that stayed at sea level?  Maybe a harder carbon formula to last over several missions  from England to Germany and back?  Is there any data on how long the brushes did last in the ETO and how often they were changed?  Perhaps they left the radio gear off most of the time, but the intercom system had a dynamotor powered amplifier, BC347,  that had to be running all the time. 

Charie, W4MEC in NC
______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20250706/aa4f492f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list