[Milsurplus] GO-9 question
howard holden
holden7471 at msn.com
Fri Jul 19 08:52:48 EDT 2024
You're right Mike, thanks! Had a PE-800-1, gave it to a CA group doing a PBY restoration.
________________________________________
From: milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net <milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Michael Hanz <aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 4:52 AM
To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] GO-9 question
The "official" aircraft inverter for the GO-9 was the 800-1. See https://aafradio.org/flightdeck/go9.html<https://aafradio.org/flightdeck/go9.html> for the details. The Navy would never use a Signal Corps inverter for its equipment. It might get Army cooties. 🙂
Just teasing, of course. The Signal Corps did provide a PU-43-A version of the Navy standard mentioned above, but the one I had appeared to be simply a label switch on the same inverter that the Navy used.
- Mike KC4TOS
On 7/19/2024 2:12 AM, howard holden wrote:
And yes Ken, you're right, the supply was 800HZ, 120VAC for both the TBW and the GO-9. The The supply had various values of switched capacitors to match the dynamotor, which I believe was a PE-103A or a PE-3 for the GO, just not sure of the designator. For the TBW it was a gas powered 800HZ 120VAC. The TBW was normally supplied in 3 water-tight cases, the GO is not, each section connects to the others.
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list