[Milsurplus] Generator wanted

Thu Mar 19 18:49:12 EDT 2020

I had an 8640B for many years, came with
the Doubler option.

It was getting tired and one day the tuning
mechanism just froze up. Since it gave me
long and faithful service, my only option was
to pitch it !!

After several minutes of searching, I decided
on the 8648 series for a replacement. As luck
would have it, I found an 8648C in great shape
and at a very good price.

It's a great generator, no regrets in spending the
money on one.

Just one man's opinion ...

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:01 PM Al Klase <ark at ar88.net> wrote:

> Ray and the group,
>
> What you're talking about is a laboratory-grade signal generator.  Here's
> a couple I know of first hand:
>
> HP-606:  Tube based, Bigger than a braedbox, LF thru HF, calibrated
> attenuator, repairable, Most seem to work without a fuss.
>
> URM-25:  Essentially a reduced-size military version of the HP-606.  Many
> need to be recapped - that's a PITA but doable,  Small size of the freq.
> dial is NFG for old eyes.
>
> HP-6840:  400 KHz - through UHF,  Digital readout,  AM and FM modulation.
> Someone mentioned the gear problem with the band switch.  I handle mine
> gingerly.  When one of these stops working it makes a nice wheel chock
> unless you're a talented technician with a lot of time on your hands.
>
> Don't discount the old-buzzard General Radio stuff.  The 1001-A and the
> rally old 405 come to mind.
>
> The Eico/HeathKit/RadioShack things are all toys.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
> On 3/19/2020 2:29 PM, Ray Fantini wrote:
>
> Signal generation is easy, the problem now days is that I have reached the
> point where I want to confirm receiver sensitivity at different frequencies
> so you have to have the ability to calibrate the output of the generator
> and a calibrated attenuator to be 100% that the radio is working correctly.
> These early synthesized radios suffer from insensitivity and in the case of
> USB only radios when trying to copy AM if the time base in the radio is not
> dead on it can be an issue. The GRC-106 receivers exciters RT-662/834
> produce an annoying heterodyne if not dead on carrier when used in AM mode.
> They use the same product detector in USB or AM with only inserting a
> carrier in the AM transmit mode to produce a quasi AM signal.
>
> The big Motorola 2000 series monitor produces signals at calibrated levels
> but get the idea that the AM on it was only an afterthought, when doing VHF
> or UHF FM its great but working on this old HF/SSB stuff is requiring a
> different tool set. Had to come up with a power meter that works down in
> the 2 to 30 MHz range along with things like the two tone generator for
> testing the transmitters and amplifiers, now I want to be able to provide a
> clean low distortion AM signal for checking distortion on the receive side.
>
> Something like the things years ago when working with VHF FM stuff and
> using the SINAD meter to tune for best audio.
>
> Have not pulled out one of the older Motorola Service monitors or a
> Cushman  to see if it has better AM, have been saving them for you to get
> you working with one.
>
>
>
>
>
> Ray F/KA3EKH
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* comcast <kg2bz at comcast.net> <kg2bz at comcast.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2020 2:08 PM
> *To:* Scott Johnson <scottjohnson1 at cox.net> <scottjohnson1 at cox.net>
> *Cc:* Ray Fantini <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu> <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu>;
> milsurplus at mailman.qth.net; MMRCG at groups.io; Mrca Mailing List
> <MRCA at mailman.qth.net> <MRCA at mailman.qth.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [MRCA] RF Generator wanted
>
>
>
> what about using an lm or bc221?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2020, at 12:09 PM, Scott Johnson <scottjohnson1 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> My choice, for the last thirty years, is the HP 8640B.  I believe it to be
> among the best generators for receiver measurement and alignment.  The only
> problem is the nylon gears, which tend to shrink and crack from the brass
> hubs.  There are people making and selling gears, and even at $300 for a
> set that, it is still worth owning one.
>
> Options include a doubler to 1024 MHz, reverse power protection
> (recommended),and variable frequency modulation.  The Military version in
> the yellow case is to be avoided in my opinion, as it lacks phase locking
> and is generally a pain in the keister, unless you (like me) collect such
> things.
>
> Scott V. Johnson W7SVJ
>
> 5111 E. Sharon Dr.
>
> Scottsdale, AZ 85254-3636
>
> H (602) 953-5779
>
> C (480) 550-2358
>
> scottjohnson1 at cox.net
>
> scott.johnson at ieee.org
>
>
>
> *From:* mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net <mrca-bounces at mailman.qth.net> *On
> Behalf Of *Ray Fantini
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2020 8:04 AM
> *To:* milsurplus at mailman.qth.net; MMRCG at groups.io; Mrca Mailing List <
> MRCA at mailman.qth.net>
> *Subject:* [MRCA] RF Generator wanted
>
>
>
> Everything old is new again! Been working a lot with repairing a lot of
> GRC-106 receiver exciters and noticed that my Motorola Communications
> Service Monitor produces a lot of phase noise and poor-quality AM on the HF
> bands. Decided that what I need is something like an old school URM-25 or
> maybe if I can find one a URM-144/SG-823 being I already have a SG-376 that
> I got last year that I have been using a lot for SSB work.
>
> As always not looking to spend a bunch of money on this but can always do
> a trade. Lot of crazy prices for URM-25 generators on eBay but use to
> seeing them at Hamfest for $20 to $50 price range. Did not realize until
> recently that you more often than not need vintage test equipment for
> working on vintage radios.
>
> It’s amazing what happens when you take modern items like the new
> generation of digital scopes today and look at things like modulation
> levels for AM carriers! Or operate DVM in high RF environments.
>
>
>
> Ray F/KA3EKH
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net <MRCA at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net <MRCA at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> --
> Al Klase – N3FRQ
> Jersey City, NJhttp://www.skywaves.ar88.net/
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20200319/6c3f6a0a/attachment.html>