[Milsurplus] Unknown Transceiver

[Al Klase]

Gang,

The angle of the antenna elements and the slots is different,

Let's see if this comes through.
Al

On 12/13/2020 9:57 PM, Hubert Miller wrote:
> I owned a BC-9 many many years ago but considering it impractical to use,
> I sold it. I learned later it can in fact be used, but still not my cup of tea.
> The antenna connectors look just as I remember them. I see Mike's point
> about the more acute angle of the antenna socket. However I am guessing
> the width of the case back plate does not allow antenna sockets at a wider
> angle and still have the length of each necessary to support the antenna.
> Perhaps the antenna elements' ends where it enters the radio, these antenna
> elements have a downward bend near the end? Or am I off base?
> -Hue Miller
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-- 
Al Klase – N3FRQ
Jersey City, NJ
http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20201213/6d45dce1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: s-l1600.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 258817 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20201213/6d45dce1/attachment-0001.jpg>