[Milsurplus] [MMRCG] Considering GO-9 Transmitter Power Options.
Ray Fantini
RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu
Sun Sep 1 20:35:54 EDT 2019
The original 800 cycle power supply keying was very stiff for the day with little variation between key up and key down. Building a modern supply at 60 cycles results in having to use larger filter capacitors and a very annoying chirp along with a mysterious chirp after letting the key up. I had to use -120 volts where the red circle is shown to cut off the tube when the key is let up. Very similar to what goes on in the TDE; always thought the TBW/GO was a striped down TDE, wonder what came first?
Ray F/KA3EKH
________________________________________
From: MMRCG at groups.io <MMRCG at groups.io> on behalf of David Stinson via Groups.Io <arc5=ix.netcom.com at groups.io>
Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2019 3:28 PM
To: ARC-5; milsurplus at mailman
Subject: [MMRCG] Considering GO-9 Transmitter Power Options.
Been considering how to revive the GO-9 HF transmitter. The original
power supply has been stripped, so that's a good reason to go with a new
60-cycle supply. The transmitter module itself has been somewhat
modified, but recoverably. The "Man With the Golden Screwdriver"
removed the 803 and socket, replacing them with an 813 PA. Simplifed
original-circuit schematic attached.
Left Red Circle:
K201 on the left is a relay contact in the original power supply. In the
original design, when the radio is keyed, this contact is grounded to
complete the grid circuits of the MO and the Buffer, turning them on. A
relay contact in the power supply then keys the B+ and B++ to the
transmitter.
Right Red Circle:
In the modded circuit, he lifted the PA grid ground connection at the
ground end of Grid Current meter M502, opening the PA grid circuit, then
connected these two "red" points together.
In original configuration, when the transmitter is keyed, both these
points are grounded and the PA's bias is developed from drive. In the
modded version, the most likely idea was to apply -250V +/- bias
voltage to cut the tubes off on key-up, and ground them for normal
operation on key-down. This isn't necessarily a bad idea; many transmit
circuits work that way. I still don't understand replacing the 803 with
the 813. The 540V supplied to the PA Screen is well above the 813's
rated maximum of 400V. The 803 Screen can take up to 600V. The 803
suppressor requires about +40V or so. The 813 is a beam power tube, so
that's kinda weird. The 813 can deliver a little bit more power for a
given power supply, but not enough to foozle-around with the design.
With 1900V B++, the 803 should deliver about 200W. With the 813,
assuming the circuit will work with it, about 250W; not enough
additional to justify the mod, IMHO.
To key the circuit as originally intended, we'd need to switch the 540V
and the 1900 V. This is not hard anymore- there are MOSFETs
off-the-shelf that can switch 3000V, even 4000V at Amps for $14-$15
these days which are plenty fast to cover CW. Regulating the 540V to
stabilize the MO is child's play now. I have NOS 803 and socket, so
putting that back original is a given.
Your opinions, please: Key the B+, or cut-off bias keying? Keying the
bias can also be done with FETs, so we don't have a fraction of a second
of unbiased tubes during the relay's throw-time.
The Green Circles:
These are the isolated filament circuits for MO/Buffer and for the PA.
The transformers in the diagram were actually located in the seperate
power supply module; not the transmtter itself. I don't see any way to
wire these to a common DC filament source, do you? I can provide both
correct-voltage/current transformers, but it's always nice to condense
and eliminate extra power busses when possible.
TNX ES GL OM DE Dave AB5S
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1030): https://groups.io/g/MMRCG/message/1030
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/33103968/1043670
Group Owner: MMRCG+owner at groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/MMRCG/leave/2381741/1260982536/xyzzy [RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list