[Milsurplus] RAK / RAL Receivers: Couple of tips.

Kenneth G. Gordon kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Tue Jun 18 16:27:01 EDT 2019


On 17 Jun 2019 at 7:18, David Stinson wrote:

> Anyone else want to add some good info
> on resurrecting the RAK/RAL?

As I have mentioned, I used an RAL-7 as my main (and only) station receiver for something 
like 12 years beginning in about 1958.

Other than bad capacitors, the only thing I really had a problem with was the non-existent  
frequency-readout.

I even bought an Eddystone 898 dial once to replace the main tunning with, but never did 
that.

Somewhere, somewhat recently, someone mentioned that one can lightly couple a decent 
modern frequency counter to the detector output and get an accurate reading, although this 
may only work when the detector is oscillating for CW and SSB.

I have not yet tried that.

I used my RAL-7 for my traffic handling net work, both CW and, first AM, then SSB, quite 
effectively for a long time.

Although I haven't used many other TRF receivers, as far as I'm concerned, the RAL is the 
finest HF TRF receiver in existence. There is a real difference in the way signals sound 
through one. They sound so "transparent", I guess. There isn't much "receiver presence" 
between the signal and your ears.

I used a new RAK-7 to work my code speed up to around 30 WPM by copying the 5-letter 
code groups being sent by the U.S. Navy VLF stations of the time. The station at Jim Creek 
Washington was strong enough into my station that I could easily measure volts of AC with 
a tuned circuit, my antenna, and a VOM. I was only about 300 miles from it. Cutler Maine 
also was copyable 24/7/365.So was NWC in Australia, and another one down in the Canal 
Zone. VLF is amazing stuff.

I sure miss those...

I have contemplated modifying an automobile alternator to make a transmitter for VLF...

I have also considered the arc transmitter. Those output CW. An old marine radio officer I 
knew in Missoula, Montana told me that one had to have the BFO on in order to copy it.

Mechanical means of producing RF always interested me.

Ken W7EKB


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list