[Milsurplus] Chinese 102/139 set

[Jim Whartenby]

Is this concern for Chinese surplus the result of the lack of military radio surplus in the US?  
In exchanges with fellow list members, it appears that just about all US military electronic surplus now has a DMIL D requirement.  I suspect that even the remaining R-390A now have that requirement, along with every other other piece of vacuum tube based military electronics.  
So I guess that only the equipment that is already in the hands of the public is all that will ever exist as US military surplus radios?Comments?Jim I wonder why people argue over the 10% of their differences and ignore the 90% they agree on?

      From: Hubert Miller <kargo_cult at msn.com>
 To: Mike Morrow <kk5f at arrl.net>; "milsurplus at mailman.qth.net" <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Chinese 102/139 set
   
 And this was a fairly recent policy change. The H.K. fellow was as puzzled as well as to the thinking behind the apparent reversal, but less puzzled than we, at least having closer insight into Chinese nationalism. ( and "social control". )If you see differently and indeed I'm wrong and such eqpt is still being exported, I welcome  learning more. -Hue


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20181010/fa80b08e/attachment-0001.html>