[Milsurplus] [ARC5] 500 Kc XMTR

[Peter Gottlieb]

I have a couple of aeronautical beacon transmitters which cover the 630 meter 
frequencies.  They were called "Light Weight Beacons," synthesized and look to 
be Viet Nam era.  I would bypass the internal CW keyer as it won't do my call 
and replace it with an Arduino.  I have a large and small antenna coupler for 
them, they use big whips.  I've never fired them up but will now do some 
testing.  Being intended for portable battery operation they probably don't put 
out much power and the efficiency of a small whip (compared to quarter wave) 
will mean that I'm more than likely to be putting out an EIRP of under 100 mW 
but hey, let's see how it does!

Peter
kb2vtl


On 9/17/2017 5:54 PM, Richard wrote:
> I think the theoretical PLC problem has mostly gone away as they have been 
> changing to fiber for easier maintainability and reliability.  Thirty years 
> ago the LF/MF region was loaded with dead carriers, PLC signals.  They were 
> considered unintentional radiators, but radiated very well indeed.  Now I 
> don't hear any. When an amateur band was first proposed there was pandemonium 
> and unreasoned fear among power people, fearing we would trip their PLC relays 
> and pull the power grid down.  Reality is PLC signals are measured in volts, 
> vs microvolts for radiated signals.  The only place radiated signals are heard 
> on PLC circuits is near megawatt navy transmitters.  We have all heard radio 
> noise under power lines, well it's much worse when you couple directly to the 
> line.  Big power transformers have significant capacitance to ground and look 
> like a bypass capacitor at radio frequencies, so they need traps at each end 
> of the line, plus a high voltage capacitor to couple to the line.  This is big 
> stuff because the inductor must pass line current, 600 amperes or more. (etc, 
> etc, etc.)
>
> WNE, licensed a year or two ago for 472 and 500 Kc as the New England 
> Historical Radio Society, was grandfathered in.  This is actually Steve 
> Russell, WA1HUD, in Stoneham MA.  Last year he was sending the North Atlantic 
> weather forecast nightly using an emergency transmitter at about 40 Watts, is 
> now working on QRO, and hoping for better results. (Usually gale winds, fog, 
> 40 foot seas, ice, and I'm glad I never went to sea...)
>
> Richard, AA1P
>
>
> On 09/17/2017 04:19 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon wrote:
>> On 17 Sep 2017 at 19:38, Hubert Miller wrote:
>>
>>> What was the rationale for the power limit? RFI to civilians?
>>> -Hue
>> No. Not at all. Several reasons, among them, possible interference to PLC.
>>
>> In addition, the USCG claims ownership of that spectrum. They have had plans 
>> for years to
>> install high-accuracy ground-mounted GPS systems there, although they have 
>> never, ever,
>> gotten funding for it, and the new eLoran will work better anyway.
>>
>> FYI, I have been involved in trying to "resurrect" the 600 meter band for at 
>> least the past 20
>> years. I started the forum, 600MRG, for 600 Meter Research Group then, and 
>> still support it
>> now.
>>
>> At one time, we had worked very hard to get a group license to operate in 
>> that band, 450 to
>> 510 kHz, and had the license in hand after at least 2 years of work, one or 
>> two of our group
>> actually got on the air, and the USCG suddenly shut the entire effort down as 
>> they had been
>> "missed" in the discussions which the FCC had initiated with users of that band.
>>
>> BTW, there were certain FCC agents who enthusiasticlly supported our efforts 
>> and gave us
>> very significant help to get our license. We were both very grateful and 
>> somewhat surprised
>> at their efforts.
>>
>> After that, within a few years, some started to apply for, and receive, 
>> experimental licenses
>> to operate on spot frequencies in the band.
>>
>> Then Dr. Fred Rabb (I forget his call) managed, after at least 3 years of 
>> work, to get a
>> "group" experimental license to operate over a very small range of 
>> frequencies in the band.
>> He had to have help from the ARRL to finally get action out of the FCC.
>>
>> Then things built from there.
>>
>> So, from my perspective, it has taken at least 20 years to get to where we 
>> are now.
>>
>> In addition, of course, there is the group, most of whom are hams, who put 
>> KPH back on the
>> air. It turns out that many of the original coastal 600 meter stations, and 
>> even some ships,
>> had valid licenses for operation in that band which had never expired, and 
>> which the FCC
>> will still renew today. In fact, I know of at least one case where someone in 
>> the midwest
>> applied for and received a NEW license for such a station.
>>
>> Ken W7EKB
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Milsurplus mailing list
>> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post:mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html