[Milsurplus] Fwd: Re: "Lancaster" - no copilot

Kenneth G. Gordon kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Wed Oct 4 12:54:11 EDT 2017


On 4 Oct 2017 at 12:27, Mark K3MSB wrote:

> My point was that I don't think the Lancaster was developed as a night
> bomber;  it transitioned to that role as a result of the loss rate for
> daylight bombing. 

>From my reading, that is absolutely true.

Ken W7EKB

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list