[Milsurplus] Fwd: Re: "Lancaster" - no copilot
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Wed Oct 4 12:54:11 EDT 2017
On 4 Oct 2017 at 12:27, Mark K3MSB wrote:
> My point was that I don't think the Lancaster was developed as a night
> bomber; it transitioned to that role as a result of the loss rate for
> daylight bombing.
>From my reading, that is absolutely true.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list