[Milsurplus] Milsurplus Digest, Vol 163, Issue 28
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Mon Nov 13 12:04:25 EST 2017
Hi
Depending on the bore of the artillery, the 500 per second could well be correct.
The Mark 12 5” Navy gun had a rifling rate of 1 in 157” (13 feet). Muzzle velocity
was around 2,500 FPS. That gets you to 192 revs per second or 11,500 RPM. A
smaller bore weapon might easily hit the 500 revs number since rifling scales with
bore size.
Bob
> On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:50 AM, Jeff Kruth via Milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I think there is an error in the article cited:
>
> To convert it to a workable device required the development of radio components rugged enough to withstand an acceleration force 20,000 times stronger than normal earth’s gravity and a centrifugal force set up by approximately 500 rotations per second.
>
> Pretty fast rotation, probably should be 500 RPM. Otherwise the rotating band would strip right through the barrel lands of the cannon.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Kruth
>
> In a message dated 11/13/2017 3:03:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, milsurplus-request at mailman.qth.net writes:
> http://www.smecc.org/radio_proximity_fuzes.htm
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20171113/96295e84/attachment.html>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list