[Milsurplus] T 240/SRT 10.....T 83/SR

[Mark K3MSB]

117 VAC.

73 Mark K3MSB

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Thekan, Paul <Paul.Thekan at cpii.com> wrote:

> Bruce
>
>
>
> I’d have to look at the manual unless Mark can look at his and tell us if
> the xmtr supply is also set up for 120v DC. I don’t think it is but have
> yet to get the xmtr on the air. I don’t recall seeing a separate as outlet
> on the power supply that the R-96 would plug into.
>
> I use the receiver occasionally and it is very nice.I have a isolation
> xfmr in the ac line for it.
>
>
>
> A friend Gerry W6NIR (SK) had told me his brother who was in the Army was
> stationed out on the East Coast during the war and was on a ‘Army’ ship
> anchored off a port on that coast on what I think he said was Harbor
> control or protection. Not sure which it was or even if it was that. Anyway
> he had the T83 and R 96 on board ship that he used to communicate with.
>
>
>
> My R-96 is the post war version with the much nicer dial ,IMO. I think it
> has a 1948/49 contract date and was made by Hallicrafters. The case on the
> R-96 is made to support and nest the T 83 onto the top of the rcvr cabinet
>
>
>
> Is yours the T-240??..Maybe the re tagging had something to do with it
> being used by the Coast Guard. If yours is a T-240 is there a contract date
> on the nomenclature plate.
>
>
>
> Paul
>
> N6FEG
>
>
>
> *From:* Milsurplus [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Bruce Gentry
> *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 6:58 AM
> *To:* Milsurplus
> *Subject:* Re: [Milsurplus] T 240/SRT 10.....T 83/SR
>
>
>
> Can the transmitter operate from 120 volts DC? I had the receiver shown in
> the picture, and it was hot chassis AC/DC. If the transmitter was AC only,
> was there a transformer to provide isolated power for the receiver? When I
> bought the receiver, I was told it was used by the Coast Guard.
>
>      Bruce Gentry, KA2IVY
>
> On 3/24/17 9:02 AM, Thekan, Paul wrote:
>
>   Hi Mark
>
>
>
>  I thought it interesting that my T 83/SR WW2 xmtr was re tagged as the T 240.
>
> I'm sure it's the same radio but wonder why it got a new designation.
>
>
>
> Paul
>
> N6FEG
>
> _____________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message, including any attachments, may include privileged,
>
> confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this
>
> communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
>
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient,
>
> please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> Milsurplus mailing list
>
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
>
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> _____________________________
>
> This message, including any attachments, may include privileged,
> confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this
> communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient,
> please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it
> from your system.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20170324/943f09aa/attachment.html>