[Milsurplus] TCM-2
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Wed Jul 5 01:04:53 EDT 2017
On 5 Jul 2017 at 3:13, howard holden wrote:
> Looking at the tube lineup it's a GO-9 (or a TBW) on steroids.....should be a fun rig to operate.
Yes. That was kinda what I figured too.
The pair of 803s will operate within specifications at 350 watts input each. Output will be
slightly more than 400 watts for the pair.
That "Navy-rated 125 watts output..." means, "Tune it up into an antenna, put a brick on the
key, and come back in a month or so and it will still be outputting 125 watts." ;-)
A pair of 813s isn't all that much better at the same voltage: 2KV.
Funny thing is, both are rated at 125 watts plate dissipation. The 813's plate dissipation rating
is actually closer to 250 watts, though.
Anyway, it is fun to speculate.
I don't understand why more hams didn't jump on the TCM. It would have been a perfect ham
rig for CW. It is small, it is VFO controlled, it covers all the main ham bands, its power
requirements are reasonable, it is very stable, keying sounds very good. Maybe there weren't
very many of them made. I dunno. It is a really neat rig.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list