[Milsurplus] Smart People: BC-9 TX/RX Freq Shift- Q?
David Stinson
arc5 at ix.netcom.com
Sat Feb 4 17:27:02 EST 2017
Aside:
My Wattmeter was wrong. Scope says the
radio is outputing 2 Watts. Powerhouse!
Smart People:
BC-9 diagram again, for reference:
https://goo.gl/photos/scKooWvzUF5GwHKe6
Was discussing with a friend the problem of
the shift in Oscillator frequency between
the Receive freq, when the first tube is acting
as a regenerative detector with 70V on
the plate, and when it is keyed as a TX
Oscillator with full 120V on the plate,
which shifts the transmit frequency lower
by about 12KC+/-. With the B+ shifting so
much, the operation freq shifted as well.
I said this couldn't have been "normal"
because these radios were in service
for over a decade and it simply
wouldn't have worked this way.
His theory had to do with my "stop-gap"
measure to get the radio working without
the full loop antenna (I have substituted
a tank coil and link-coupled output).
His position:
"Think of the math factors of the situation and
what is different. The original loop had
a certain inductance, a certain distributed
capacitance and a certain, small series
resistance. It is a very Hi-Q device with,
therefore, a very narrow resonance point.
You have substituted a link-coupled coil.
It has an inductance, a different distributed
capacitance and a series resistance,
which is much larger than that of the loop.
When you switch to Transmit, your greatly
increasing the loop currents, the IR losses
and distributed capacitance losses, lowering
the circuit Q, flattening the resonance curve
and thus moving the oscillation point. The
problem is not the B+; the problem is the
degraded Q of the circuit."
What do you think of his analysis?
73 DE Dave AB5S
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list