[Milsurplus] Research Help Requested
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Mon Aug 28 13:02:00 EDT 2017
I've been reading that PDF that someone here gave us a link to, the Henney 1956 reliability
report. I find it extremely interesting from several viewpoints and can recommend it to any of
us here.
Apparently, no one who "mattered" was concerned in the least about reliability of equipment
during all of WWII, and it was only AFTER WWII that the reliability became a serious issue.
I was only somewhat surprised to learn that up to 60% of gear received by the military was
unusable as received, for any of several reasons, poor packing being a big one.
In one case, a piece of equipment had been tested at the factory to a shock of 25 Gs, but
when the stuff was shipped, the makers began receiving many reports of defective gear
upon receipt. A factory rep was dispatched to follow the gear from the factory to its
destination, and watched as the crate containing the gear was dumped off the truck, 4 feet
to a concrete floor. When the crate was opened, and a shock sensor was examined, it was
found that the gear suffered a shock of 35 Gs.
Some things I found interesting was that something like 14% of aircraft communications
gear was affected, but that up to 84% of radar gear was affected.
Believe me, those of us who are involved in safeguarding the remaining WWII radio gear
would do very well to read this entire paper. For one thing, it goes heavily into the
components used in our radio gear, and secondly makes some extremely interesting
suggestions concerning design.
I intend to read it all, and more than once.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list