[Milsurplus] [ARC5] ATD Project: "Correct Receiver?"

[Gene Smar]

If we’re also interested in heaviest rigs, pounds per Watt, I’m thinking of the BC-611 (ca. 200 mW and 5.5 pounds = 28 #/W).  Also in the same class are RT-176 (26 #/0.9W = 29 #/W); RT-196 (6.75#/0.3 W = 23 #/W); CRT-1 (6#/0.3 W = 20 #/W); and RT-505 (26#/2W @51 MHz = 13 #/W).  But the granddaddy of them all is the BC-1000 (32#/0.5 W = 64 #/W!)

 

Glad we met ET at Roswell and he showed us everything about IC’s.  Life has been much better.

 

73 de

Gene Smar  AD3F

 

 

 

From: milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ray Fantini
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 10:40 AM
To: Nick England <navy.radio at gmail.com>
Cc: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] [ARC5] ATD Project: "Correct Receiver?"

 

One of my favorites would be the AN/URC-7 in terms of weight, uselessness in today’s world and difficulty in getting into operation being crystal control on the transmitter and receiver.  Not to mention the only couple URC-7 transceivers that I have seen were designed to run on 120 Volts DC only!  At 165 Lbs. developing 25 watts that works out to 6.6 pounds per watt. The ATD assuming 125 Lbs. with dynamotor developing 40 watts is just a light weight at 3.125 pounds per watt. The AN/WRA-3 would be a whopping 40.4 pounds per watt but don’t see that as anything but a exciter, maybe paired with something like a AN/WRT-1 transmitter weighing in at 1030 Lbs. with the AN/WRA-3 exciter at 607 Lbs. is a total weight of 1637 Lbs. for 500 watts for a figure of around 3.2 Lbs. per watt in CW but a respectable figure of a little over 13 Lbs. per watt in AM.

Think the Navy has the market cornered when it comes to size and weight. A note, the Johnson Viking 2 produced around the same time developed around 135 watts at just under 80 Lbs. for a figure of 0.6 Lbs. per watt.

 

Ray F/KA3EKH

 

 

 

From: milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net <mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net>  [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Nick England
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 9:34 AM
To: Hubert Miller <kargo_cult at msn.com <mailto:kargo_cult at msn.com> >; Mike Morrow <kk5f at arrl.net <mailto:kk5f at arrl.net> >; WF2U <wf2u at ws19ops.com <mailto:wf2u at ws19ops.com> >
Cc: ARC-5 list <arc5 at mailman.qth.net <mailto:arc5 at mailman.qth.net> >; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net <mailto:milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> 
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] [ARC5] ATD Project: "Correct Receiver?"

 

My candidate is the AN/WRA-3

607 lbs, 15w output, CW only

 

http://www.navy-radio.com/xmtrs/wra3-spec.pdf

 

Cheers

Nick

 

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM Hubert Miller <kargo_cult at msn.com <mailto:kargo_cult at msn.com> > wrote:

C'mon, at around 100+ lbs. per complete installation, for around  40W out, that's not really that bad, is it? I cd probably come up with serious contenders. -H

 

 

 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

- Original message --------

>..... Incidentally, I think  it is one of the heaviest transmitters watt per pound, with its 40 W output.

73, Meir WF2U

 

______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net <mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-- 

Nick England K4NYW

www.navy-radio.com <http://www.navy-radio.com> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20170801/d68a3640/attachment-0001.html>