[Milsurplus] Info wanted for novel - Navy Radio in Sept 1950
Rob Flory
farmer.rob.flory at gmail.com
Sat Apr 22 06:08:39 EDT 2017
I think the RDO was more oriented towards radar countermeasures than
communications intercept.
RF
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com
> wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2017 at 19:35, Rob Flory wrote:
>
> > Radio intercept equipment would include RBB and RBC receivers with
> RBU/RBV panoramic
> > adapters for HF and for VHF, the RBK receiver with RBW panoramic
> adapter. The panoramic
> > adapter shows the presence of signals over a wide band, showing the
> operator targets to tune
> > into for investigation.
>
> What about the RDO and its plug-ins and its panoramic adapter? Was it too
> out-dated by
> then?
>
> I have two of those and a bunch of the plug-ins. They are simply beautiful
> inside, but they
> weigh....A LOT... I do not have the panoramic adapter, though.
>
> BTW, I found an old QST magazine, like December of 2013 or something like
> that, in which
> it was mentioned that you provided a working TBX-6 for the Code Talkers
> event.
>
> Good on ya, Rob.
>
> I have a TBX-8 transceiver but no other bits, not even the cover. And the
> power connector
> pins had been soldered to before I got it.
>
> Ken W7EKB
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20170422/a5ad6190/attachment.html>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list