[Milsurplus] Vibrator Replacement Challenge
Bill Cromwell
wrcromwell at gmail.com
Fri Apr 7 11:05:32 EDT 2017
Hi,
I have built and *used* the two transistors (plus a couple of resistors)
in the astable multi-vibrator circuit (about 30 years ago). It used a
ferrite pot core transformer but it was the circuit of a transformer
with a center-tapped winding for the power input. I used a 12 volt DC
input and powered / reliably operated the equivalent of a 6SN7 tube
heater but with 1000 VDC exposure (CRT heater). By the way - high
voltage came from another solid state 'vibrator' supply. For lower
voltage exposure the teflon tape I used for insulation would not be
required. I no longer have the homebrewed scope. I repurposed some of
the assemblies 20 or so years ago. The point is - this will work in
theory AND in *practice*. Somewhere around here I have the remains from
a couple of tube type V/UHF mobile radios with solid state plate
supplies and it's the plate supplies I kept (if I still have and can
find). I do not recall how complicated - beyond two transistors - those
are. But the solid state switching (in place of mechanical vibrators) is
not some "new" pipe dream. I rejected vibrators and dynamotor operation
ages ago but I recall the parts count being quite a bit higher than just
the vibrator or the vibrator would not last. Vibrators are not needed to
operate vacuum tubes with batteries for heater and plate supplies. I use
a combination like that with my command receivers and have used battery
packs with other receivers. Some of us run low power (tube) transmitters
with batteries for B+. If you want to avoid keeping up with several
battery packs you can rely on the mechanical or solid state switching
(pick your poison) to get the voltages you need from a single battery -
perhaps your car or truck battery. Or just get rid of the tubes (ducking
and running). Get the tools and the soldering iron out and 'get er done'.
73,
Bill KU8H
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list