[Milsurplus] possible modifications for RBC receiver?
George Babits
gbabits at custertel.net
Sun Sep 18 21:02:31 EDT 2016
Hi Ken,
Well, if I need to have a product detector, I just use my Collins S-Line
gear. Works great and saves a lot of ruination of older receivers. Nothing
wrong with the older receivers and I much prefer to use them the way they
were designed to be operated.
73,
George
W7HDL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006 at frontier.com>
To: <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] possible modifications for RBC receiver?
> On 18 Sep 2016 at 18:34, George Babits wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> The RBB and RBS are grest receivers. Why pervert them with a product
>> detector? Just turn off the AVC, turn the BFO on, and you can copy
>> SSB
>> just fine. Over the years I have picked so many receivers that have been
>> ruined with crappy product detector conversions that I just can't imagine
>> why people do that. Is it just so the S meter will read (maybe) on a SSB
>> signal?
>
> No. In order for THAT to work, one also has to pervert the AGC system. The
> AGC voltage
> must be taken out of the IF chain before the detector so that the BFO
> doesn't lock the AGC
> voltage high. All AGC systems of the day took the AGC voltage off the
> detector.
>
> Actually, a GOOD product detector results in far more "recovered audio",
> greater apparent
> receiver sensitivity, and reduced noise than the old diode detector ever
> could.
>
> Furthermore, a GOOD single-triode product detector will operate as a very
> good AM
> detector when the BFO is turned off. Although I haven't examined that
> detector (used a lot
> by Collins and Heathkit) in any detail, I suspect that with the BFO
> voltage turned off, the
> detector acts much like an infinite impedance detector for AM. But that is
> only a WAG.
>
> That single-triode PD is simple and works very well. Most other PDs I am
> familiar with are
> MUCH too complicated. One of the early PDs shown in handbooks of the
> period, uses
> THREE triodes. Another uses a 6BE6 mixer tube. I don't like either one.
>
> After all, all a PD is is an audio-frequency mixer. In fact, the Pullen
> Mixer makes an
> excellent PD.
>
> Anyway, I modified an almost new BC-779 many years ago with that
> single-triode PD, and it
> made an immense improvement in the receiver. I was amazed at the
> improvement. It
> became my favorite receiver.
>
> But as you say, George, most modifications were never thought out
> thoroughly and just
> plain stink. And this includes many which were published in the ham
> literature.
>
> The OT who designed the gear to begin with were no dummies. They knew what
> they were
> doing.
>
> Ken W7EKB
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list