[Milsurplus] Dave and others have Radio Direction Finding Equipment type DU-1. NEED RECV!

[Al Klase]

Ed,

I _/think/_ ARB receiver might be appropriate as well.

Al

Al Klase – N3FRQ
Jersey City, NJ
http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/

On 10/7/2016 5:09 PM, Ed Sharpe Archivist for SMECC via Milsurplus wrote:
>
> Dave and others have Radio Direction Finding Equipment type DU-1 or 
> looks like that - - really nice and  clean - - ad  for   20 years on 
> the top of my  den shelf........ NEED RECV!   a ru-19 or    does this  
> go  with arc  5  stuff too?
>
> if I can pait it up with something would  look   good in SMECC milcom 
> display.
>
> thanks ed sharpe www.smecc.org <http://www.smecc.org>
>
> RU 19 front 
> <http://pa0pzd.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/20141121_132340.jpg>
>
> Here an overview of the RU 19 installation. Left the directionfinder 
> loop antenna type DU- 1.
>
> DU1 <http://pa0pzd.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/DU1.jpg>
>
> Radio Direction Finding Equipment type DU-1. Made by Bendix.
>
> Suitable for using it with RU-19 series.
>
> scr274ru002 <http://pa0pzd.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/scr274ru002.jpg>
>
> Left the receiver and right the transmitter. Above the receiver a 
> homing receiver type ZB 3. The receiver is also suitable for 
> directionfinding.
>
> RU 19 side view 
> <http://pa0pzd.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/20141121_132358.jpg>
>
> On the rightside of the receiver, inserted  into the receiver,  a 
> tuningbox for a  frequency wave band, this one for the Longwave band.. 
> There were several boxes, for all different wave bands, which could be 
> inserted into the receiver. Some right on the picture some spare 
> tuningboxes.
>
> In a message dated 7/23/2016 6:30:25 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, 
> arc5 at ix.netcom.com writes:
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "gordon white" <gewhite at crosslink.net>
>     >     If you care about what you collect, figure out where it can
>     > go
>     > after you can no longer care for it... Someone cares,
>     > somewhere.
>
>     Excellent advice.
>     I'm thinking when it comes to mil-radios, the best solution
>     if possible is to connect the radios with a military vehicle of
>     some kind, which has a greater chance of being preserved
>     long-term than a stand-alone radio with a collector base
>     who's average age is now 68.   I'm beginning the search
>     for such places for some of my complete sets.
>     It's time.
>
>     73 DE Dave AB5S
>
>
>     ______________________________________________________________
>     Milsurplus mailing list
>     Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>     Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>     Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>     This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>     Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20161007/8bdf34d8/attachment-0001.html>