[Milsurplus] SIMPLE Carbon Microphone Substitute.
Mike Feher
n4fs at eozinc.com
Sat May 28 12:02:34 EDT 2016
Yep, I agree Pete. It is just hat an electret is such a high impedance
device. I would think a FET might be more appropriate. I'll have to look up
the specs on that BJT. - Mike
Mike B. Feher, N4FS
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960
-----Original Message-----
From: Milsurplus [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Peter Gottlieb
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:58 AM
To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] SIMPLE Carbon Microphone Substitute.
The current source of the electret must be right in the correct range for
that kind of transistor.
On 5/28/2016 10:57 AM, Mike Feher wrote:
> Dave -
>
> I am actually surprised that circuit works with nothing but the base
> of the BJT going to one side of the electret I would at least expected
> to see a resistor, audio bypassed, in the emitter, and, a high value
> resistor from the base to ground. But, it is hard to argue with "it
> works" HI. 73 - Mike
>
> Mike B. Feher, N4FS
> 89 Arnold Blvd.
> Howell, NJ, 07731
> 732-886-5960
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milsurplus [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf
> Of David Stinson
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:25 AM
> To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net; boatanchors at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Milsurplus] SIMPLE Carbon Microphone Substitute.
>
> Been working on a simple substitute for the Carbon microphone used
> with the BC-669. I've seen some multi-IC, 3-dozen-part designs which
> hugely violate The Law of Pernicious Parts Count:
> "Every part in a project beyond about eight
> reduces the number of people who will build it
> by 50%."
> So no one builds them. I hope this one will get tried and improved:
>
> https://goo.gl/photos/26HUmzVuqhZKWrNZ7
>
> Cobbled it together and it works well with the BC-669.
> I picked that transistor because it was the first one I grabbed from
> the "NPN Small Signal" drawer and my Android phone called it "General
Purpose."
> Other common NPNs will likely work as well.
> The electret element isn't mark +/-. I soldered it in one way and it
> didn't work. Turned it around and it did.
> Will try it on other rigs as the weekend goes on.
>
> 73 DE Dave AB5S
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list