[Milsurplus] Good receivers was Why Germany Lost the War

[Hubert Miller]

I can't think of any post-HRO Nationals except the NC-100 and RAO types, and
those don't strike me as particularly

exceptional equipments,  considering their only average frequency indication
and the limited selectivity options.

The AR-88 i will never own, due to its weight + bulk, but i'm very curious
as to its features, as i don't have the manual.

-Hue 

 

 

>Yes, if anyone in the WWII era mass produced a better general coverage HF
receiver than the RCA AR-88, you have to prove it to me.

Al



Al Klase - N3FRQ
Jersey City, NJ
http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/
 

On 3/18/2016 10:57 AM, Rob Flory wrote:

Any discussion of the better receivers of WWII would be incomplete without
AR-88 family and the many post-HRO Nationals.

RF





 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20160318/7c32f123/attachment.html>