[Milsurplus] BC-221-J vs BC-221-T or what?
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Fri Feb 12 20:17:30 EST 2016
Hi
Fire them both up and see which one works better / drifts less / still agrees with the cal book the closest.
Bob
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 7:49 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 Feb 2016 at 0:38, Don Merz via Milsurplus wrote:
>
>> I guess the time has come for me to keep one of these in the shack. I have had
>> literally dozens of them go through my hands over the years. Now I have two here
>> and one of them is going to stay. But which one? The J model is in lesser
>> condition. The T model is almost like new. Both have AC supplies in them--the
>> one in the T model might be a factory supply. The one in the J model is almost
>> certainly homebrew. Both have the spare tubes and hex wrench where they ought to
>> be. Both have the correct calibration books. Both were made by Zenith.
>>
>> Is there any reason to prefer one over the other except overall condition? I
>> have not tested them yet. But it does not seem like they would be hard to get
>> running. Is there an achilles heel in them that I should check?
>>
>> Any suggestions welcome.
>
> My suggestion would be to dump both of those units, keep the best/factory
> power supply, and find a BC-221-AJ, AK, or AL in similar condition.
>
> Those were the only BC-221s which included modulation, like all LMs did.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list