[Milsurplus] TCS Transmitter: OK Smart People; Why?
David Stinson
arc5 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Feb 12 10:25:01 EST 2016
I think I know why an outstanding transmitter like the TCS, with
both MO and Xtal oscillators, never got real traction as a Novice
rig (other than the high price at the time).
Those familiar with crystal-controlled transmitters of the 40s
and 50s will recognized this pentode oscillator circuit:
http://home.netcom.com/~arc5/TCS/TCSXtal.jpg
The values in black are nominally the ones found in the many
flavors of this circuit. The values in red are those found in
the TCS transmitter. The TCS values bias harder and reduce the
screen voltage considerably. As a result, crystals like FT-243,
CR-1, HC-6 and even large-blank FT-241 will not reliably function
or fail to oscillate altogether. However- I have a couple of
pre-war, Collins-made large-blank transmit crystals:
http://home.netcom.com/~arc5/TCS/TCSTXXtalCollinsPreWar.jpg
With these installed, the oscillator is perky as a pug. With
parallel resistors installed to bring the cathode down to 500
Ohms and the Screen dropper down to 22K, all properly active
crystals I've tried work well and give good drive.
The engineers knew what they were doing and what the result would
be. Why did Collins do this? Were they trying to ensure only
crystals bought from them would work? Is this why it's easy to
find TCS Receiver crystals, but Transmitter crystals are scarce?
Curious. Thoughts?
GL OM ES 73 DE Dave AB5S
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list