[Milsurplus] "Rare" Gear
Hubert Miller
kargo_cult at msn.com
Sun Aug 7 13:44:26 EDT 2016
George, what was so special about the R.P.A.-3 that someone needed to design
and produce a receiver with a production run of 160-something ?
What do the letters R, R, A represent?
How does it manage to be that heavy?
tnx
Hue
-----Original Message-----
From: Milsurplus [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
George Babits
Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 6:52 AM
To: Mike Morrow <kk5f at arrl.net>; 'MilSurplus' <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] "Rare" Gear
Geeze; is the GO-6 "rare?" Thinking that it was of no value, I was going
to gut out the one I have. But, with today's shipping costs, "rare" may not
equate to "valuable." I think the Canadian army R.P.A.-3 Receiving Set
may be in that category. One collector in Canada told me that the one I
have is only the third one in existance that he knew of. But, with a serial
number of 16x, they must have made over 160 of them. At over 100 pounds,
"rare" may not be "valuable."
73,
George
W7HDL
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list